Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751524AbXAUMpW (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:45:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751521AbXAUMpW (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:45:22 -0500 Received: from av5.karneval.cz ([81.27.192.12]:9047 "EHLO av1.karneval.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751510AbXAUMpW (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:45:22 -0500 From: Pavel Pisa To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: Realtime-preemption for 2.6.20-rc5 ? Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:44:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: Sunil Naidu , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200701210039.27284.pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> <1169370638.6197.175.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1169370638.6197.175.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701211344.05853.pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 41 On Sunday 21 January 2007 10:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I preffer > > to stay on "stable" kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable > > appears. > > This is a very weird statement, the -rt kernel includes so much > experimental work it cannot be called 'stable' by a long shot. > > Sure its not known unstable, but neither is .20-rc5. There are no security fixes for rc and our own experience is, that RT patch has very low impact on base system stability. The rc-s contains much more experimental stuff all over the kernel which needs to be stabilized till next (hopefully) stable release. > If you want -rt, just run with the latest unless you have a very > specific need not to. We have run successfully 2.6.16.1-rt12 over last summer semester on students diskless stations without much problems. (Main problem has been some NFS FS problem with 1GB/s server, 100MB/s stations and switches in between, but it has been same for non-RT kernel. We solved that by switching NFS over TCP.) We would like to upgrade to something which would not cause us much troubles for next course run. We teach real time control in X35POS course and we need fast responses and timing (100 usec) for direct PWM and IO control. On the other hand, I agree that for own experimentation and development it is better to build on latest released version. Best wishes Pavel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/