Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616B8C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356300AbhLFWLr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:11:47 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:3341 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239517AbhLFWLp (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:11:45 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10190"; a="234932709" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,292,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="234932709" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2021 14:07:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,292,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="479282144" Received: from ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com ([172.25.110.23]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2021 14:07:00 -0800 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:05:50 -0800 From: Ricardo Neri To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tim Chen , Arjan Van De Ven , Ricardo Neri , Len Brown , Srinivas Pandruvada , Artem Bityutskiy , Chen Yu , Song Bao Hua , yangyicong , Michael Larabel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make Cluster Scheduling Configurable Message-ID: <20211206220550.GA18698@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com> References: <20211204091402.GM16608@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211204091402.GM16608@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 10:14:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:32:37PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > Tim Chen (5): > > scheduler: Create SDTL_SKIP flag to skip topology level > > scheduler: Add SD_CLUSTER topology flag to cluster sched domain > > scheduler: Add runtime knob sysctl_sched_cluster > > scheduler: Add boot time enabling/disabling of cluster scheduling > > scheduler: Default cluster scheduling to off on x86 hybrid CPU > > s/scheduler:/sched:/, surely? > > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 + > > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 26 +++++++ > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 23 +++++- > > include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 7 ++ > > include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 6 ++ > > include/linux/sched/topology.h | 3 +- > > include/linux/topology.h | 7 ++ > > kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++ > > kernel/sched/topology.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++- > > kernel/sysctl.c | 11 +++ > > 11 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > *groan*,... I was more thinking of something like so. > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > index ac2909f0cab3..617012f4619f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c > @@ -579,6 +579,17 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_numa_in_package_topology[] = { > { NULL, }, > }; > > +static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_hybrid_topology[] = { > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT > + { cpu_smt_mask, x86_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) }, > +#endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC > + { cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) }, > +#endif > + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) }, > + { NULL, }, > +}; > + > static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = { > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT > { cpu_smt_mask, x86_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) }, > @@ -1469,8 +1480,11 @@ void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus) > > calculate_max_logical_packages(); > > + /* XXX for now assume numa-in-package and hybrid don't overlap */ > if (x86_has_numa_in_package) > set_sched_topology(x86_numa_in_package_topology); > + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU)) > + set_sched_topology(x86_hybrid_topology); > > nmi_selftest(); > impress_friends(); FWIW, I tested this and now I don't see cluster scheduling interfering with asymmetric packing when running on a x86 hybrid topology. Tested-by: Ricardo Neri