Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F7CC433FE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 05:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233651AbhLGF0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 00:26:44 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:50397 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232346AbhLGF0l (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 00:26:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1638854590; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nOPl6fNnDqyLc2iLRZj8llqR0D/uS4usdUmozPcKuBE=; b=VArzJRbL888UNQzJa+P7H1l54b+aV+xroJ47hwupvQfdu//dDRxIgCuOzFOMAtJK2WO4la Fjf3L0rNrniboPQf+Zt2XYe9ZqB5VrT4CUQGSRpXPsbUnlVTG02B9b9MulQ7gJtRUAjLQM fz8AJW39jzL+Osgnkb14i5O9hDbRDGI= Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-547-BOuJp-pxPXOQR7uwScntWA-1; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:23:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: BOuJp-pxPXOQR7uwScntWA-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id n13-20020a9d6f0d000000b00579e30aaa02so5264224otq.0 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:23:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nOPl6fNnDqyLc2iLRZj8llqR0D/uS4usdUmozPcKuBE=; b=sRxVzur6kwylDYD1LVHA4TY+JvLhymHcP/FHPZJI2tThkFrai3S5Doc2IDh+BLL6JL rEwqZzakGOrxXpd5mqUTGupNA1raKyH52A3kVKzYaQH06zy2YTDrYjMA4cEjJt00TtuD iKgV0ObtpSGNUl6Yq/wy27ngc1HoBKkYrvl8r/Qii0vg0oWxJJqQcpt7Y95bN5wuMWDC xzLwv+Wcmud6upUkE9fzSJIzcm23JHb7KEE4k3YA/2qoDwOT3XukHORIDppv5EJ4QzFK jdQA0reVHOrpUE0E+nvbwsbtwRuXVuzDJ6cDt+XsSI+Dux8SMS9GG+Ip/fWuK7najHud h3Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530u8OoaMgJlwovuI1tkJiVmFT54jYjtbzqLEUf+3iKXVTGA5tGc WUQu2L/DQd1D3u9pZtnMJV/DfNoPG/fWdwNpkzI/G+aIrqQ6+2oTIxRsp+M2hZuMAVqb0Ta9h0B gXpWdbNzXBXUaxVKBS63+4fk/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15a:: with SMTP id h26mr3160607oie.36.1638854588441; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:23:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeB7ysFyGExc4t3uLswmEafqkwWmLqI1VRqyDPAPC4Fj2ymiEfFyeiBEy2cjuHo8VI9/cUjQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:15a:: with SMTP id h26mr3160593oie.36.1638854588275; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from treble ([2600:1700:6e32:6c00::45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12sm2569041oom.44.2021.12.06.21.23.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 21:23:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 21:23:04 -0800 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Jiri Slaby , Peter Zijlstra , ardb@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maz@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, tabba@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] linkage: better symbol aliasing Message-ID: <20211207052304.pb76ofjymf7o2yyb@treble> References: <20211206124715.4101571-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211206124715.4101571-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 12:47:09PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > This avoids repetition and hopefully make it easier to ensure > consistency (e.g. so each function has a single canonical name and > associated metadata). > > I'm sending this as an RFC since I want to check: > > a) People are happy with the idea in principle. > > b) People are happy with the implementation within . > > ... and I haven't yet converted the headers under tools/, which is > largely a copy+paste job. Looks like a definite improvement to me. The only suggestion I'd have would be to fix a minor naming inconsistency: change "SYM_FUNC_LOCAL_ALIAS" to "SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_LOCAL" to match the other "_" macros. -- Josh