Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751457AbXAUTtU (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:49:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751455AbXAUTtU (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:49:20 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:43629 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751448AbXAUTtT (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:49:19 -0500 Message-ID: <45B3C3B4.6000706@zytor.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:49:08 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Junio C Hamano CC: Willy Tarreau , git@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Announce] GIT v1.5.0-rc2 References: <7v64b04v2e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3b6439uh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070121134308.GA24090@1wt.eu> <7v7ivg1a25.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <7v7ivg1a25.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1542 Lines: 40 Junio C Hamano wrote: > > One worry I had about releasing git-1.5.0-rc2-1.rpm and friends > just like the "official" ones was that people might have scripts > to automate downloading & updating of packages, and they may not > like to get "beta" installed for them. > > I wonder if kernel.org machines are also affected... > Put them in a different directory hierarchy if you don't want to make them installed. >> I know it's a bit late to ask, but if new on-disk format changes, isn't >> it time to bump the version to 2.0? It would be easier for many people to >> remember that GIT 1.X uses format version 1 and that GIT 2.X uses format >> version 2 with backwards compatibility with 1.X. I also think that 1.5 >> is much more different from 1.0 than a mid-term 2.0 would be from current >> 1.5. > > I think we could have gone either way (as you said, it is > probably a bit too late to discuss this), but it should probably > be Ok to stay at 1.X as long as these one-way-street format > updates are turned off by default. > > And the above happened way before this round and people have > hopefully been happily using. For example, v1.4.2 was done > early August 2006. In general, though, I would agree that the major number should change if there is an incompatible change. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/