Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4DBC4332F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 08:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232329AbhLGISg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 03:18:36 -0500 Received: from bzq-84-110-109-230.red.bezeqint.net ([84.110.109.230]:49891 "EHLO mx.tkos.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232151AbhLGISf (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 03:18:35 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 516 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 03:18:34 EST Received: from tarshish (unknown [10.0.8.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tkos.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A8A440855; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:06:08 +0200 (IST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tkos.co.il; s=default; t=1638864370; bh=esweGkmM1TaFxAsLsotS7LKsL2FjaGbpG3oTnnMt2EY=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=GcPgxTp47EJex9304Cwrh1a93q3dHMKWiHIjz8ZTn4NegGPU69yqh7Su5vmg5fO+P Kh7nqdgkBIpI3Rf9UzzHq/x7N7cBaA/7R0ZE12PQaFHPd0XT3nfMmWwSoc6YNW6HJ/ sY7u4RIykgN0trrfVUJdtS/HSKo97dqJciT8yZxSr0wjGT9g5g4otk+PHV0JYm9p9k P9YzQWW8WWhUeig+fPqnm1HPGtUlIZxk5urZr4h4aKbE+4xA9oZm9Je0d93bTim8GN 1As0GD0fgMDT/yrRdfvnw9AkNJRlBW1Fj0uJad+Crzam3J4mee0elu9epTaexUTQ7t Pqt45gjbFAkpw== References: <20211202210839.79140-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20211207080325.6hfokrrcs45iucx6@pengutronix.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.1 From: Baruch Siach To: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Marc Zyngier , Matti Vaittinen , Sergio Paracuellos , Chunyan Zhang , Bartosz Golaszewski , Tony Lindgren , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Linus Walleij , Jianqun Xu , Alexandru Ardelean , Thierry Reding , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Ray Jui , Florian Fainelli , Scott Branden , Gregory Fong , Eugeniy Paltsev , Keerthy , Orson Zhai , Baolin Wang , Chunyan Zhang , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Matthias Brugger , Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Grygorii Strashko , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , Robert Jarzmik , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Heiko Stuebner , Ludovic Desroches , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Jonathan Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:05:08 +0200 In-reply-to: <20211207080325.6hfokrrcs45iucx6@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <87ilw0on3z.fsf@tarshish> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Uwe, On Tue, Dec 07 2021, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > Hello Andy, > > you Cc: linux-pwm and the pwm maintainers in this series. I don't spot > anything pwm specific here (apart from touching gpio-mvebu which also > contains a PWM driver). Do I miss something? That's probably because of drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c that appears in the MAINTAINERS PWM entry. baruch --=20 ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =3D}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------= {=3D - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -