Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:55:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:55:32 -0500 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:43450 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 05:55:17 -0500 To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS, Paging & Installing [was: Re: Swap] In-Reply-To: <20011120135059.D4210@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <200111210122.fAL1MwhC029913@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> <20011120174622.A12996@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 21 Nov 2001 11:55:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20011120174622.A12996@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Mike Fedyk writes: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:22:58PM -0300, Horst von Brand > wrote: >> Mike Fedyk said: >> > Do any newer versions of NFS fix the stateless server >> > problem? >> >> This is an _extremely_ hard problem: The server has to know >> somehow what the client thinks the state is... and either one >> (or both) may have been rebooted in between without the other >> one knowing. > Yep, but there are currently protocols (SMB) that do that, but > not necessarily in a unix way. Exactly how, pray tell, does SMB cope with recovering the full state info after client/server crashes? Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/