Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE85C4332F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239576AbhLGQVk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:21:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239562AbhLGQVe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:21:34 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0323CC061574 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 08:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id w1so1628226ilh.9 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 08:18:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=98f/j99AuJzhZ6H5G/BaaKmxrlUIJ+qa/P4gIH2gWOw=; b=se7fm4oskX7jefsflWX65qMvO6PKk5Vo6IwV/PRz7zFtyMYQE2iYOK+wEqcMZjY9o5 S8JlXR/lfXvbuJxbpBCafNY3X9IjzakaxHaxWi+6u5yTDiqlf4xinpJGOtr+ARR4kuC/ TUgwJYSg6a761I8ND1z2BOf3gmjtfygD2UFF5u9v53BvNAtsn4Ez9qxLVyUkyUeF6Kr4 QcLbfhCZE3Cbb7ORBHhC0iCAx6xvBUnMhySVGFRuGoxEA9wGqsXA7ChauWsCcf9dF3yB s15PRFBIhzw2QiBoEHdZbNScPYUsAR+1CWyqDum1MsWOTjRcs7NN/TzPtgtrEG9sKbe1 2GZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject :message-id:date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=98f/j99AuJzhZ6H5G/BaaKmxrlUIJ+qa/P4gIH2gWOw=; b=C55upurlecFfJIlgVw+FplWRRkxGLMo5EUDkdGZUEMl2GKVBR7tGN/AQmHV9hzXQ6s 3qT+9EPkvJZaBNzLSHehWZTcLXvdfR6YHN9QQWy84DM3y4FGZIv/CdYDLfdeQulLgPm8 f0M286wZPaG3b/gta8h6nemEuZ2NUPETlZCNdihlQYQCEdviMeCn1yd0Xxik5IriwNDd kd4w2R0UXV4PJlrUGF86xeilOHzie6dpqSeKF+UCzT1Z5Kn++CrJAjVlZGCsGknQ15Uc RuelCTaS06WUW5KXCHjuLukdcE6i3jUlf61ceMEAEn1H06QoBkzDJ9rgCU6Vo+SSGpid qElw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300k7M9EbrhOaVIp5okV63U8g1QfhvuljPgv9BsLdEwI/+3KjZH 2fJbUBuLAt3f1zae+6kZrQ+GXPpvW8bAYclg X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz111zaVwF/YHQfSDLhMEcjob8y5Likudp/zcGxdQ9NGB8pmN5q3jD2siCFohjNC35oN8G9ag== X-Received: by 2002:a92:8751:: with SMTP id d17mr380244ilm.148.1638893883342; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 08:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1.localdomain ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm95941ill.36.2021.12.07.08.18.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 08:18:02 -0800 (PST) From: Jens Axboe To: John Garry Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, ming.lei@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <1638794990-137490-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> References: <1638794990-137490-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags Message-Id: <163889388252.160645.10327363566878499665.b4-ty@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:18:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:49:47 +0800, John Garry wrote: > In [0] Kashyap reports high CPU usage for blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() > and callees for shared tags. > > Indeed blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() would be less optimum for moving to > shared tags, but it was not optimum previously. > > This series optimises by having only a single iter (per regular and resv > tags) for the shared tags, instead of an iter per HW queue. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/3] blk-mq: Drop busy_iter_fn blk_mq_hw_ctx argument (no commit info) [2/3] blk-mq: Delete busy_iter_fn (no commit info) [3/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags (no commit info) Best regards, -- Jens Axboe