Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF05AC433FE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 20:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241043AbhLGUJI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:09:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40958 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235966AbhLGUJH (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:09:07 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73F7C061746 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:05:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id x131so360844pfc.12 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 12:05:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZgYEUXbXJnnaXhuLas61v51X/GU1A03HhoOGNbWznls=; b=myJbxd20cJHzOhtFzksBCaz14XF0J+ZIoFTkJKwkBAQSsbKJKSnUDKGZpVCWcxgrUx nwknjq4sOXBawDYgFdZssPFZPiM1d5PNq+B0OVvWjsWoe+BP+GIMdxWlb5Os7EE28mlE QADptOhOeTmblUDKZo+wzpthShGAhxtqhnpPZwCfZ0tOU+q7ZP76PBhR4+5XWhR0vV08 HnDJa7X4VFnGQ0VTvPdam4fSB3GQLowXFu8TVdc4FIFJEDxJzXf5r+7Hg/z3yhf9UOJ9 0B8/Wc4YL/JJiFkJhwUEQtQWq3j3lW/hZ8gGylmYU+orUtAIQqt1JhzyvcU+PIYQJqwU DNeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZgYEUXbXJnnaXhuLas61v51X/GU1A03HhoOGNbWznls=; b=EQZNMvHtyVj/RPduKec/nfo8WLUNkTtDOwpgeTGozXXeGoyzl8ipIxtJwfrqXevpO9 JT36Z2fP0ZAvBaMNZB00rUDzQqAPrSGYir2OQTnJ3KwNZbjIzuL4tO0WVhwseuRKSrWy kK6yAV6jKq5BqxDpiMZ6vXb0ZAijxqGjev2d+xA7IRz3pI/iT5Es1JjWVy9FUL1o6h2F w3F6i5iY/lPpRvpMrdlb1zNYBYvEizprBNA7JHqQW/GEsDZUpO63PySoGVFdlZ4gCDu1 2ljj4rSvKxozK74SDGNBtKxCL3hS1Frf91D9A4uYISHtEDy7VJEpks4t451LzViBuhoG 0Rkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Gxk53ORVG3Id01M1GMjP2NaK0Q4oZM0RnN4583380kFsBZlhj pbMRLFkRRCSi9qZSjSJaZoQcy4e3QQ5MDRGH+/zTUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwSkadnRD6LrIKmzZwTM9QAa4PDN+XAQfPHrmj3HkH9rSrr8S1Hsw8ZlLuS9gBam7VH5GhHZqA2fRlFPr9XXo= X-Received: by 2002:a63:34f:: with SMTP id 76mr25135340pgd.609.1638907536157; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 12:05:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211026153638.3857452-1-dlatypov@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20211026153638.3857452-1-dlatypov@google.com> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:05:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: remove claims that kunit is a mocking framework To: Daniel Latypov Cc: davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:36 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: > > KUnit does not have any first party support for "mocking". > > The original RFC had some, but the code got dropped. > However, the documentation patches never got updated. This fixes that. > > https://kunit.dev/mocking.html has a current writeup on the status quo > and will hopefully be eventually folded into the in-kernel > Documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins