Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Wed,  8 Dec 2021 01:52:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20211208015236.1616697-1-seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211208015236.1616697-8-seanjc@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20211208015236.1616697-1-seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/26] KVM: VMX: Move preemption timer <=> hrtimer dance to
 common x86
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Handle the switch to/from the hypervisor/software timer when a vCPU is
blocking in common x86 instead of in VMX.  Even though VMX is the only
user of a hypervisor timer, the logic and all functions involved are
generic x86 (unless future CPUs do something completely different and
implement a hypervisor timer that runs regardless of mode).

Handling the switch in common x86 will allow for the elimination of the
pre/post_blocks hooks, and also lets KVM switch back to the hypervisor
timer if and only if it was in use (without additional params).  Add a
comment explaining why the switch cannot be deferred to kvm_sched_out()
or kvm_vcpu_block().

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c |  6 +-----
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 64932cc3e4e8..a5ba9a069f5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7444,16 +7444,12 @@ void vmx_update_cpu_dirty_logging(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static int vmx_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu))
-		kvm_lapic_switch_to_sw_timer(vcpu);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void vmx_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (kvm_x86_ops.set_hv_timer)
-		kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(vcpu);
+
 }
 
 static void vmx_setup_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a05a26471f19..f13a61830d9d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10041,8 +10041,21 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	bool hv_timer;
+
 	if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) &&
 	    (!kvm_x86_ops.pre_block || static_call(kvm_x86_pre_block)(vcpu) == 0)) {
+		/*
+		 * Switch to the software timer before halt-polling/blocking as
+		 * the guest's timer may be a break event for the vCPU, and the
+		 * hypervisor timer runs only when the CPU is in guest mode.
+		 * Switch before halt-polling so that KVM recognizes an expired
+		 * timer before blocking.
+		 */
+		hv_timer = kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu);
+		if (hv_timer)
+			kvm_lapic_switch_to_sw_timer(vcpu);
+
 		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 		if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED)
 			kvm_vcpu_halt(vcpu);
@@ -10050,6 +10063,9 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
 		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
 
+		if (hv_timer)
+			kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer(vcpu);
+
 		if (kvm_x86_ops.post_block)
 			static_call(kvm_x86_post_block)(vcpu);
 
@@ -10244,6 +10260,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			r = -EINTR;
 			goto out;
 		}
+		/*
+		 * It should be impossible for the hypervisor timer to be in
+		 * use before KVM has ever run the vCPU.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu));
 		kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
 		if (kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu) < 0) {
 			r = 0;
-- 
2.34.1.400.ga245620fadb-goog