Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62474C433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 03:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243835AbhLHDXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:23:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232839AbhLHDXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:23:41 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E06C061574; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id bf8so2234574oib.6; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:20:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ipzGWXUTrKfsJcUKnBbciLM67OZ1SYoLF2ZfjF2KeT4=; b=bobOpMtKzG9mSNF4Fp2Op+a2P8xAsFhOpDUPZrn5XqfOy1O61yRXHLXXfDqtiISE4p NVgm6ACxEriLu1giILI5FSQkA62MP/XtmDO7HskU/15cW5ksrK9E4PL2A16QGIRXYaX8 y91IuVcs3AyQpr3hxxifbv22CxX8mGT6jP+95YOEPcF3YggrAAHP6apEctKuArWUZpAk YlHfAl4rlcTA0yL1cfZgYnhHs2hgKoX0eZKxZ//PtGKTYSbiagQ0nCfufoOAKGxDQ/HT baYVjtYXOU9Fh0gVOqY6AGn9tIEbkRviWeNNI9wthjxv9qK/3FsllLjfi+PTi4cXh5rX P1mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ipzGWXUTrKfsJcUKnBbciLM67OZ1SYoLF2ZfjF2KeT4=; b=TA+k+tu5kbXNIuRxg9Vi9SGk8TusLO1QgR43g0pYsweWz2EfJhy3c5rNI5MzAZb+aZ j5/IPFEx4bIVYtdcp+taIKNuTDvdOBoY3wyQCBMQ3E33Pu13fQ8gdppcTOqZPhsDveau 4Ksbcs8hE7x7KNv0AfInSiV2k9RnCsZEgaOwDMWeG3NHQPeYSjXoLSUCRb8WOQ12Ifig 0U+wDN4AkYo3g3fXkzby8LqmkgDs88stPrHDl0MJlW5kKdzLwqk4bohOgxeyVQ19O4co KPSmD8kvI6cctbWrTVi3JpNd9EzwRe/DX00yW+rRw7dn0CQ+2dYrQ/il6gROEYj2T6P3 XJsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UxQ9u1x0z2ZRJpT1PvaIe8vls9zW80aikuUur+N1XzQ5kXxdf RKAyOXOaOJn5I/Z8wGmgXkM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyH0gWYQ1T5h3GfTNMDRwlAXjdRTRWOmqe5j8m70em6JUBwiUNxj0q/fGAnHMMHLwR5iGW7nw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1903:: with SMTP id bf3mr9073447oib.7.1638933609321; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.2] ([8.48.134.30]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm355301oil.32.2021.12.07.19.20.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:20:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2918f246-7a48-4395-42bb-d50b943480c6@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 20:20:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh: ipv6_ping test failed Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski , "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" Cc: "Zhou, Jie2X" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "shuah@kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Li, Philip" , lkp , "Ma, XinjianX" , "Li, ZhijianX" References: <20211207075808.456e5b4f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <20211207075808.456e5b4f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/7/21 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Adding David and Zhijian. > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:07:40 +0000 Zhou, Jie2X wrote: >> hi, >> >> I test ipv6_ping by "./fcnal-test.sh -v -t ipv6_ping". >> There are two tests failed. >> >> TEST: ping out, VRF bind - ns-B IPv6 LLA [FAIL] >> TEST: ping out, VRF bind - multicast IP [FAIL] >> >> While in fcnal-test.sh the expected command result is 2, the result is 1, so the test failed. >> ipv6_ping_vrf() >> { >> ...... >> for a in ${NSB_LINKIP6}%${VRF} ${MCAST}%${VRF} >> do >> log_start >> show_hint "Fails since VRF device does not support linklocal or multicast" >> run_cmd ${ping6} -c1 -w1 ${a} >> log_test_addr ${a} $? 2 "ping out, VRF bind" >> done >> >> The ipv6_ping test output is attached. >> Did I set something wrong result that these tests failed? >> >> best regards, ping6 is failing as it should. Can you send a patch to change the expected rc from 2 to 1?