Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493A9C433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231628AbhLHKbe (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 05:31:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231621AbhLHKbd (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 05:31:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD9CC061746; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 02:28:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id m25-20020a7bcb99000000b0033aa12cdd33so3107034wmi.1; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 02:28:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BKcPPW7IsO/x+f5xXO+3Ai5akR8LBUqm+pPaSHNiqaw=; b=MzZSPR2GDhhUjRAxxpQMYD4DkRH2UE3izAKhExIbSvn1R4xOSY2ok6I6b3otoR8c+m zrRpt98koiCmcyljitl9pkzUjjSXmDYBu1O+GLN6M5kemdlzLj0aHwVVWSUwL9vKgXja q0hkJJ5FNPGAaFDAV20Hy0F0XZyawehPNIpnQ1ejAg0AX8dR/rQG79FDlGYigjd1tp04 /arhwAdKxVpu6bsCSp1RcyF4I7u+IDpLcgQ8dX0k19Fo0aAWUUdd1zCtffsKDRjyQ20s vB2jpYcTBxSwMtpAdeTLovR9Eklq4Pg8Ja+58dDMo+iswVKkFMKvAZ3QysUlpXEss+Uu rCbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BKcPPW7IsO/x+f5xXO+3Ai5akR8LBUqm+pPaSHNiqaw=; b=4S9pLNZEY5UFgwrkO+tuJv7sA1Y7FkJ0Sfk0s0bYlxpPoRL3HWDQN+97KGER/9sI+g PAGuFCc2fDyCY8Ml5ETo1cW1JthKx4+MtUDd8UHZVsUHKFaIFsV5bWA9yvG6W5fFTZSC fhQO/LPKyV4LtOBTp7Pzq/wQT0mKzOEbjqIx5nOGVSQQ7MqHIx/d5JWvjQssTqxw7EQA 8CKEkCXnCmSE7L+C8hQmcHJV86nJfd7TWkdIxc8kHTLMf4K212Y9EHUTFMZ4Cly8opUN Is9Q2jJH5N6lwSwC6PAW1Nx6yN86e7H16/A7ncm6gmwcQydaKAqlX4pAyvpEebyJjzWz ln+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IIeH2LZ8t9ZP8H5bvTheezGn7TPOluSDytwBGVTHIh7UjEYc0 8IYpoprW3Kee5NS3co3Ncjo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDeI/u0LWzyfKmvhYFK+LLNKNBrQ8e7khN/yblE4VoDyn4UG9mQIQM69ocettJz66wCkShtA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:287:: with SMTP id 129mr15022905wmc.49.1638959279788; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 02:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm2185332wme.39.2021.12.08.02.27.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 02:27:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:27:57 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/48] 4.19.220-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211206145548.859182340@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211206145548.859182340@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 03:56:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.220 release. > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:55:37 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/481 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip