Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751839AbXAVP6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:58:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751850AbXAVP6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:58:20 -0500 Received: from [212.12.190.41] ([212.12.190.41]:32917 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbXAVP6T (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:58:19 -0500 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: O_DIRECT question Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:59:51 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701221859.51776.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 21 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Linus may be right that perhaps one day the CPU will be so much faster > than disk that such a copy will not be measurable and then O_DIRECT > could be downgraded to O_STREAMING or an fadvise. If such a day will > come by, probably that same day Dr. Tanenbaum will be finally right > about his OS design too. Dr. T. is probably right with his OS design, it's just people aren't ready for it, yet. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/