MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YalDQe/lyXqAxB0K@uudg.org> <20211207201712.7yqbksbba3zgu7u3@linutronix.de>
 <20211207152049.1013e1ce@gandalf.local.home> <20211207205628.auc54rwl4duuisah@linutronix.de>
 <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home>
From:   Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:14:41 -0300
Message-ID: <CAD8J--9V7KxJrT==vnoawWXpp9Ur_-o2Fhm_ebNd4-hH8ncfPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>, carnil@debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
> > > > =E2=80=A6
> > > > >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-=
5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz
> > > >
> > > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject =
line?
> > >
> > > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> > > scripts ;-)
> >
> > It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?
> >
>
> It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release o=
f
> 5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues.
>
> Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it.

Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
the code and missed something that obvious.

Sorry for the confusion I caused.

Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
subjects fixed?

Thanks for spotting that,
Luis

>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>