Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:48:28 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>, carnil@debian.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58
Message-ID: <20211208144828.y2e2d4h3yincjyqg@linutronix.de>
References: <YalDQe/lyXqAxB0K@uudg.org>
 <20211207201712.7yqbksbba3zgu7u3@linutronix.de>
 <20211207152049.1013e1ce@gandalf.local.home>
 <20211207205628.auc54rwl4duuisah@linutronix.de>
 <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home>
 <CAD8J--9V7KxJrT==vnoawWXpp9Ur_-o2Fhm_ebNd4-hH8ncfPg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD8J--9V7KxJrT==vnoawWXpp9Ur_-o2Fhm_ebNd4-hH8ncfPg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-12-08 10:14:41 [-0300], Luis Goncalves wrote:
> Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
> the code and missed something that obvious.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion I caused.
> 
> Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
> subjects fixed?

No, I don't think that it is worth it. Please correct it for the next
release.
I'm not sure if there is a need for the base version in the patch tag.

> Thanks for spotting that,
> Luis

Sebastian