Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5D4C433FE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 16:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237152AbhLHQj6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:39:58 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:57630 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234717AbhLHQj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:39:57 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1B8GZwTu049909; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1638981358; bh=tw3OwjdRj9vPXb5r6L5qlp2b1Rq60gScqhejarKuboQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=phbfquo7sSUEfHU3aehyPafiMJo3S0rXoxXzAtxBVx3QZ0HamrR/0CUim9lktODSN s1eGtSrDum7rCKBfDsfn8S5h+wdpPkNhICmhgtoj9HikZfKwTu3xsYPL1EPdm3a/1g Z0mHyVdb4CyP8pZXtM2Ojfscbd/ejU9F/4zG3MNA= Received: from DLEE115.ent.ti.com (dlee115.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.26]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1B8GZwZI066212 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) by DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1B8GZw1I075184; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:35:58 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Roger Quadros CC: Miquel Raynal , , , , , , , , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: omap2: Add support for NAND Controller on AM64 SoC Message-ID: <20211208163558.5pvs7j7cmwwpmzrk@trickily> References: <20211123103609.14063-1-rogerq@kernel.org> <20211123103609.14063-5-rogerq@kernel.org> <20211124131552.6b9bc506@xps13> <20211126104231.7cc43149@xps13> <917ac002-9d4b-237d-94f3-bcd05f481f39@kernel.org> <20211129043633.myxmgp6idbrqvx5p@unlisted> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16:45-20211208, Roger Quadros wrote: [..] > Did I understand correctly that we can use a different compatible for older SoC > in the overlay? e.g. ti,am642-es1.0 ? If that is what we would desire. There are a few SR1.0 (not ES1.0) examples for previous devices in [1] NOTE: the dts in k.org will always point to the latest production SRx.y device that has been released to market (aka products going to market). previous pre-production SR support tends to be with overlays for various quirks. > > If so then I can get rid of soc_device_match and use compatibles matching only in this patch. As appropriate for the subsystem. [1] https://git.ti.com/cgit/ti-linux-kernel/ti-upstream-tools/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D