Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89C0C433EF for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239854AbhLHTxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:53:18 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:37563 "EHLO mail-oi1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239819AbhLHTxR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 14:53:17 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id bj13so5577439oib.4; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 11:49:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rVa3BN9ICjdPo+fxW6/2/1jtvm1eoAj57oX8lHz++pw=; b=iS3E2lQ7SGtPCoVkn32OY25v0hzkRYwtJBw2asI/JWpjQENmccyiIEH+ecoi/GxDvI mw+DB3cF/tqz6K6laAPFjqmSvA6HkCvUybUdwmDid3E/xVtsKHiJEe9RLf8RZEnAgNMQ ZlIDAmwpTB/T74sPbjy9cj5ql9Z6sg9PXUjh9+ngek152L6ZHnQXGBgWN3vyQOU18rNy rlyBSz5Tg7AdyQaxm9vIUm1S+JYamfCXaG1eBTQmBswk5EjR45KWzdFHYZNK0Kar9TnK RcGMeyeqZq/DwcuALgxilLVYKQcwnApBGtohDRpcfCtm0dwZxNTOb3EpjB7tihn/VPzJ FQdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ttUx+0egS0eTE0FBENH4kfSOoJ/DeIlkCGXLh2TtJpUZz6cYU NKEa8bDD9mM3exyI7Cqz/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJJITFE08gJlrj4ZABcCwvdBcDXuejUXyN59mEmfcVXx82o4BMKcMc3mdXNIIAG4u7Fh9qkg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2181:: with SMTP id be1mr1377432oib.147.1638992985277; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 11:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm649392oon.27.2021.12.08.11.49.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 11:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 257561 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:49:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:49:43 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Rob Herring , Saenz Julienne , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jim Quinlan , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: compatible is required Message-ID: References: <20211202223609.1171452-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211202223609.1171452-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 14:36:09 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > The compatible property is required, make sure the binding documents it > as such. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Applied, thanks!