Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C95C433FE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 22:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237756AbhLHW0d (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:26:33 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]:44708 "EHLO ams.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234854AbhLHW0b (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:26:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311A4B8228D; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 22:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2345C341CC; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 22:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1639002176; bh=eKFpyZC9BLvX9lVOCVzTFYu6b4aRhjKeW09ndCoDaCQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=ev2xuooFgb69FmD7whpWXaPm0KWu6Cve7QUSR+Ie//5dYyRb8B7a2tIKS6zcVxkbo 2dWLTSem+a8m7AS4SSthCAc7sjW76wInQtk4Sv6Mx3ClklEtFTSZ/tohvSn2FGTV/L Bf8lQkqfEnxplOQ/heoJy8Mt+1QvC8woT4dBjdeZkHegdNDLRx2NDCLJGqcx3bO7ns Nd2BzH/dklX5K0M9LgLC9JqBD7MOC38N6VShkAmGcDoF7KUm7DfmNb9nqqGgtpwpuW 7f/JtzvB1V2MQOZjTWK1ml7PUzENfi+bTI46xBHx6grNvE2ydyyyqNdVIGNmEPRuED cK7T/ck8Gyv2Q== Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id r25so13256456edq.7; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:22:56 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TwoaSU3JxEGLI8dB5oL9l55r4As+lKKBwZgTrAdpWY/Y2CW0G EIsW9J1bTex+7xIPy1XygZYHlqkHgm3eeN+PNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHHdaNJfvFi0sI/HjOkrWBWisEFUIu9ryX5hwydJP/Y5X5tZvxQ+QXhTZZyza5lIuAtjB5Y1K6ou/+yx97mFI= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc07:: with SMTP id b7mr22707726edu.327.1639002175205; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:22:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211208040432.3658355-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20211208040432.3658355-7-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <1638971068.781821.3857737.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> <536cbdb6-a541-2f86-faa6-acb1a4e1c173@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rob Herring Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 16:22:43 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pci: Convert iProc PCIe to YAML To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Ray Jui , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" , PCI , linux-arm-kernel , Scott Branden , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:21 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > On 12/8/21 5:44 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:04:32 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > >> Conver the iProc PCIe controller Device Tree binding to YAML now that > > >> all DTS in arch/arm and arch/arm64 have been fixed to be compliant. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > > >> --- > > >> .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt | 133 ------------- > > >> .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml | 176 ++++++++++++++++++ > > >> 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) > > >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt > > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml > > >> > > > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > > > > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > > > This will change in the future. > > > > > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1565076 > > > > > > > > > pcie@18012000: msi-controller: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm53340-ubnt-unifi-switch8.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360_entphn.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360k.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958300k.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958305k.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958522er.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525er.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525xmc.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958622hr.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958623hr.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625hr.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625k.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dt.yaml > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm988312hr.dt.yaml > > > > Those would mean that the binding patch was applied without the DTS > > patches earlier in the series? > > Right. I generally don't look at dts patches, but I did look at these > and don't see how this one is fixed (nor caused): Note that unevaluatedProperties is only enabled in the dtschema main branch. Rob