Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 01:16:23 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] KVM: X86: Fix when shadow_root_level=5 && guest
 root_level<4
Message-ID: <YbFY533IT3XSIqAK@google.com>
References: <20211124122055.64424-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
 <20211124122055.64424-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211124122055.64424-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> If the is an L1 with nNPT in 32bit, the shadow walk starts with
> pae_root.
> 
> Fixes: a717a780fc4e ("KVM: x86/mmu: Support shadowing NPT when 5-level paging is enabled in host)

Have you actually run with 5-level nNPT?  I don't have access to hardware, at least
not that I know of :-)

I'm staring at kvm_mmu_sync_roots() and don't see how it can possibly work for
5-level nNPT with a 4-level NPT guest.