Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DBBC433EF for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 03:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231459AbhLID07 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 22:26:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229601AbhLID06 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 22:26:58 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D13C061746; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id bj13so6953820oib.4; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:23:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaiQdEjeQgtiO7My0G1bhU9pQQQWDld/fjZwkvTV2qg=; b=cij8CdkzIxcadjQ1Oc8n960V/si9bwcrKT/VG+JdU8NN79NdVwJfuohpULmFpH5w9J MGPVbXS49aSwYI/onvRBWAYXQ+mmSnKE5P1KrLFsZ5KGZ6nsZ6oXAuasU5mBgZG4OHaR iXAbgIAN9wlKbtHyiQXBGwm6/CeH1KSK83h2AYBN4WE8Pt3+MMG/vBzx5AXx/vMiakGZ a4O0+4fyZ2O3tUltgWGHtwKycrNrAOmjR1UbVAMMCJnE4amBNYMKpX7gVVDjwS+UBu5A JYrr0bBj5Pq7OtWocTFSo1ZezViBPtuh+1DlYowPZw95dtKQKR64h3xW5imAUIKFgA7s Ev5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xaiQdEjeQgtiO7My0G1bhU9pQQQWDld/fjZwkvTV2qg=; b=jKyZMgyuDvpUWGlV/nLASYEBvrXXDw1ivZq4cJek5NDLMn5isQRjgtc1xr8BSQNkcc axLvMfU4zVfM54XEUzfKuH4vDFq7lkumPI8fcneBqUoGrkmtMbItyrkkfkH/nasSiJf9 ccfgb4rbz8nclyoL8Dk9Xkd4sapI17xviGkvvoPzRvfHuKj1mLPOvXUWwtxuaLL+ixDE kZJ5BcpRJRYKG8JdqSt0S3YKFGUeythF+e5ZwScOsqlB3RnlsaohIR+bFNwkAjdzqKYF zpcrGDXXgR2ldafkoDKcZCMkJ7Q6es/wRxIkuVhiDdHwMpiBxK04y2S8w8Mr7J9TZ22a 2rCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lAnpGtT2zF835ILalB3t4jaRQRR4iuyatoFF3JejyGQyYQJS0 Hl8lOB25LBmjBd/GxVEleFk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyImiy3jkcr5GmEBihnV7J2/At9FjEdELP4kpcSWoPLuCnnKRXARbWbmfoLR4qIuEpG86bW+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a54:438d:: with SMTP id u13mr3562445oiv.156.1639020205149; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.2] ([8.48.134.30]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm880384otg.64.2021.12.08.19.23.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:23:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0a2668a6-e819-926c-f8bd-069957cb3db0@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 20:23:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [net] seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block Content-Language: en-US To: Andrea Mayer , "David S. Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , Yohei Kanemaru , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stefano Salsano , Paolo Lungaroni , Ahmed Abdelsalam References: <20211208195409.12169-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <20211208195409.12169-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/8/21 12:54 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote: > When an IPv4 packet is received, the ip_rcv_core(...) sets the receiving > interface index into the IPv4 socket control block (v5.16-rc4, > net/ipv4/ip_input.c line 510): > > IPCB(skb)->iif = skb->skb_iif; > > If that IPv4 packet is meant to be encapsulated in an outer IPv6+SRH > header, the seg6_do_srh_encap(...) performs the required encapsulation. > In this case, the seg6_do_srh_encap function clears the IPv6 socket control > block (v5.16-rc4 net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c line 163): > > memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb))); > > The memset(...) was introduced in commit ef489749aae5 ("ipv6: sr: clear > IP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation") a long time ago (2019-01-29). > > Since the IPv6 socket control block and the IPv4 socket control block share > the same memory area (skb->cb), the receiving interface index info is lost > (IP6CB(skb)->iif is set to zero). > > As a side effect, that condition triggers a NULL pointer dereference if > commit 0857d6f8c759 ("ipv6: When forwarding count rx stats on the orig > netdev") is applied. > > To fix that issue, we set the IP6CB(skb)->iif with the index of the > receiving interface once again. > > Fixes: ef489749aae5 ("ipv6: sr: clear IP6CB(skb) on SRH ip4ip6 encapsulation") > Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer > --- > net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: David Ahern