Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932153AbXAVU6g (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932195AbXAVU6g (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:36 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50701 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932169AbXAVU6f (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:58:29 +0100 From: Bernhard Walle To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alon Bar-Lev , Russell King , tom@dbservice.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm Message-ID: <20070122205829.GA20248@strauss.suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , Alon Bar-Lev , Russell King , tom@dbservice.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070118125849.441998000@strauss.suse.de> <20070118130028.719472000@strauss.suse.de> <20070118141359.GB31418@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45AF92E7.50901@dbservice.com> <20070118152326.GC31418@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070122115650.d0be8bd3.akpm@osdl.org> <9e0cf0bf0701221231sc638114j2f0123650ffc14ea@mail.gmail.com> <20070122124442.9eed5fd9.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070122124442.9eed5fd9.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1501 Lines: 49 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andrew Morton [2007-01-22 21:44]: >=20 > > Some general comments... or should I CC other people etc... > > I submitted this several times but got almost no architecture to ACK. > >=20 > > I just don't know how we can progress with this issue... All we wanted > > is to break the 256 limit in x86... >=20 > yes, the patches looked reasonable-looking. But iirc they were against > 2.6.19 which is prehistoric. Please redo and resend against a development > kernel. I refreshed the patches from Alon against 2.6.20-rc4-mm1. Or was I totally wrong? Regards, Bernhard --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH E-Mail: bwalle@suse.de Maxfeldstr. 5 Phone: +49 (911) 74053-0 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany OpenPGP DDAF6454: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6 BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFtSV1iGU2lt2vZFQRAgNTAKCuMN0r/EP+8YzWCAGmV9+8Osi73ACfUY9q rh3+yjfHM8J/LaFJuL8erJU= =WRSc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/