Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751952AbXAVVz1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:55:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751953AbXAVVz0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:55:26 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-43.bluehost.com ([69.89.18.12]:37992 "HELO outbound-mail-43.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751952AbXAVVzZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:55:25 -0500 From: Jesse Barnes To: Olivier Galibert Subject: Re: [PATCH] update MMConfig patches w/915 support Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:55:33 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven References: <200701071142.09428.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <200701081327.16019.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <20070116192800.GB4192@dspnet.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20070116192800.GB4192@dspnet.fr.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701221355.34810.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.161.73.10 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1546 Lines: 34 On Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:28 am, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > But won't the bridge register value control what actually gets > > decoded? If so, it sounds like this BIOS is buggy wrt mmconfig > > mapping in general; good thing I'm not using any PCIe devices I > > guess... > > Yeah. I've checked the docs, I think I know what's going on. On one > hand, if the chipset is configured to have the range somewhere, it is > decoded before anything external to the chipset, be it ram or mmaped > i/o. So the information you get from the chipset should not be able > to conflict with anything by definition, it's the anything that > wouldn't be visible. > > But in your case of a f0000000-ffffffff mapping, something else > interesting is going on: it's conflicting with other internal > registers of the chipset, which, being fixed address, probably have > priority. So you probably have to either reduce the range so that > the chipset registers aren't touched, or drop mmconfig if the address > is f0000000. > > Technically, we can have the exact same problem with the other > chipsets. BIOSen suck. Ouch. It doesn't seem like there's a sane general way to fix this up, aside from some sort of blacklist. Maybe it's best to leave this particular bridge unsupported for now... Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/