Message-ID: <f74efd4a-eee8-3927-f975-92b4c457cb9c@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:39:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] cgroup/cpuset: Add new cpuset partition type &
 empty effecitve cpus
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= <mkoutny@suse.com>
References: <20211205183220.818872-1-longman@redhat.com>
From:   Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211205183220.818872-1-longman@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/5/21 13:32, Waiman Long wrote:
> v9:
>   - Add a new patch 1 to remove the child cpuset restriction on parent's
>     "cpuset.cpus".
>   - Relax initial root partition entry limitation to allow cpuset.cpus to
>     overlap that of parent's.
>   - An "isolated invalid" displayed type is added to
>     cpuset.cpus.partition.
>   - Resetting partition root to "member" will leave child partition root
>     as invalid.
>   - Update documentation and test accordingly.
>
> v8:
>   - Reorganize the patch series and rationalize the features and
>     constraints of a partition.
>   - Update patch descriptions and documentation accordingly.
>
> v7:
>   - Simplify the documentation patch (patch 5) as suggested by Tejun.
>   - Fix a typo in patch 2 and improper commit log in patch 3.
>
> This patchset includes one bug fix and four enhancements to the cpuset v2 code.
>
>   Patch 1: Allow parent to set "cpuset.cpus" that may not be a superset
>   of children's "cpuset.cpus" for default hierarchy.
>
>   Patch 2: Enable partition with no task to have empty cpuset.cpus.effective.
>
>   Patch 3: Refining the features and constraints of a cpuset partition
>   clarifying what changes are allowed.
>
>   Patch 4: Add a new partition state "isolated" to create a partition
>   root without load balancing. This is for handling intermitten workloads
>   that have a strict low latency requirement.
>
>   Patch 5: Enable the "cpuset.cpus.partition" file to show the reason
>   that causes invalid partition like "root invalid (No cpu available
>   due to hotplug)".
>
> Patch 6 updates the cgroup-v2.rst file accordingly. Patch 7 adds a new
> cpuset test to test the new cpuset partition code.
>
> Waiman Long (7):
>    cgroup/cpuset: Don't let child cpusets restrict parent in default
>      hierarchy
>    cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have empty
>      cpuset.cpus.effective
>    cgroup/cpuset: Refining features and constraints of a partition
>    cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type
>    cgroup/cpuset: Show invalid partition reason string
>    cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in
>      cgroup-v2.rst
>    kselftest/cgroup: Add cpuset v2 partition root state test
>
>   Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst       | 168 +++--
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                        | 440 +++++++-----
>   tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/Makefile       |   5 +-
>   .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh       | 667 ++++++++++++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/wait_inotify.c |  87 +++
>   5 files changed, 1142 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/wait_inotify.c
>
Hi,

Is this patch series good enough or is there other changes you would 
still like to make in this series?

Cheers,
Longman