Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932951AbXAWKxk (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:53:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932955AbXAWKxj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:53:39 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([217.147.92.249]:3856 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932951AbXAWKxj (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:53:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:53:31 +0000 From: Russell King To: Alon Bar-Lev Cc: Tomas Carnecky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm Message-ID: <20070123105331.GB20660@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Alon Bar-Lev , Tomas Carnecky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070118125849.441998000@strauss.suse.de> <20070118130028.719472000@strauss.suse.de> <20070118141359.GB31418@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45AF92E7.50901@dbservice.com> <20070118152326.GC31418@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070122221400.GE6262@strauss.suse.de> <20070122222725.GB32085@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <9e0cf0bf0701230237j5aa1bbya3a70da314e471b9@mail.gmail.com> <20070123104140.GA20660@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <9e0cf0bf0701230250nb8d9738redc3e1d963b40bda@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9e0cf0bf0701230250nb8d9738redc3e1d963b40bda@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1016 Lines: 26 On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:50:15PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 1/23/07, Russell King wrote: > >See Message-ID: <20070118152326.GC31418@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> sent on > >18 January in this thread. Such strings might as well be initialised to > >an empty string. > > So it will be fine if I initialize it to "" and remove the static from > the your example? Why do you want to remove the static? > BTW: Is there a difference between "" and initialize it to {0}? Not in the end result. However, "" is a string but {0} is an array. So, "" helps to say to the reader "we're treating this as a string". Also, "" is quicker to type than {0}. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/