Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDE0C433FE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237031AbhLJK6O (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:58:14 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:61452 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234152AbhLJK6N (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:58:13 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1BAARRQJ013030; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : from : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=kxoiwD+73F5/gWkak1Ha+u2AaAfacQl1MT15ZEXwpeE=; b=deTsFbBq5eazwVskE2mgTK3Gs/9ngv3YVnPRmPzF3NYzWloc17eYwTdKYA1IlaxP3/pO gtob9i3myAeqbZFac/cRXdcPHHirhHhz49Gj5JO4+rJzg+sqwxgE19S7FD0r5e6KEIZq sLe2NMA0zgaQmSWVoIOs7w3I7/NLQmu13B4NNZAz7i/XhyMa0bYzm85BR9im6toUplvS TotIewHQw4Y+Y7dR+7FHHbgM9xp86gPVF0Hm+1e0PtBuqNrrDffMhY+xWJd96bOh0wmC V/DHLftUAJon/dDoKw0ZVIu8wE0yh5oClAmrKVS+2xxPofB8vwYsKn0udzRWonyTzqZB ng== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cv55j8f4y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:37 +0000 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1BAAZB0O024276; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:37 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cv55j8f4f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:37 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1BAAlX7o010916; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:34 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3cqyybj3g0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:34 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1BAAsU8P18088192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:31 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6494AE057; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6539AE055; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.171.35.34] (unknown [9.171.35.34]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:29 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:55:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/32] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation Content-Language: en-US From: Pierre Morel To: Matthew Rosato , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211207205743.150299-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> <20211207205743.150299-15-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> <1816b176-0866-5f68-d3ea-813fab13d3e3@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1816b176-0866-5f68-d3ea-813fab13d3e3@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: _6cftZhry1li2A6pY73J__xd87ZQepc8 X-Proofpoint-GUID: mTGSVv4AzONsz4M5CS8vye0sAjolXUIq X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2021-12-10_03,2021-12-08_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112100057 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/21 10:54, Pierre Morel wrote: > > > On 12/7/21 21:57, Matthew Rosato wrote: >> Initial setup for Adapter Event Notification Interpretation for zPCI >> passthrough devices.  Specifically, allocate a structure for >> forwarding of >> adapter events and pass the address of this structure to firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato >> --- >>   arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h |  12 ++++ >>   arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c        |  17 +++++ >>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   3 + >>   arch/s390/kvm/pci.c              | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   arch/s390/kvm/pci.h              |  42 ++++++++++++ >>   5 files changed, 187 insertions(+) >>   create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/pci.h >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h >> b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h >> index 5331082fa516..e5f57cfe1d45 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_insn.h >> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct zpci_fib { >>   /* Set Interruption Controls Operation Controls  */ >>   #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_ALL        0 >>   #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_SINGLE        1 >> +#define    SIC_SET_AENI_CONTROLS        2 >>   #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_DIRECT        4 >>   #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_D_ALL        16 >>   #define    SIC_IRQ_MODE_D_SINGLE        17 >> @@ -127,9 +128,20 @@ struct zpci_cdiib { >>       u64 : 64; >>   } __packed __aligned(8); >> +/* adapter interruption parameters block */ >> +struct zpci_aipb { >> +    u64 faisb; >> +    u64 gait; >> +    u16 : 13; >> +    u16 afi : 3; >> +    u32 : 32; >> +    u16 faal; >> +} __packed __aligned(8); >> + >>   union zpci_sic_iib { >>       struct zpci_diib diib; >>       struct zpci_cdiib cdiib; >> +    struct zpci_aipb aipb; >>   }; >>   DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(have_mio); >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> index f9b872e358c6..4efe0e95a40f 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ >>   #include "kvm-s390.h" >>   #include "gaccess.h" >>   #include "trace-s390.h" >> +#include "pci.h" >>   #define PFAULT_INIT 0x0600 >>   #define PFAULT_DONE 0x0680 >> @@ -3276,8 +3277,16 @@ static struct airq_struct gib_alert_irq = { >>   void kvm_s390_gib_destroy(void) >>   { >> +    struct zpci_aift *aift; >> + >>       if (!gib) >>           return; >> +    aift = kvm_s390_pci_get_aift(); >> +    if (aift) { >> +        mutex_lock(&aift->lock); >> +        kvm_s390_pci_aen_exit(); > > Shouldn't we check for CONFIG_PCI and sclp.gas_aeni here as in gib_init ? > >> +        mutex_unlock(&aift->lock); >> +    } >>       chsc_sgib(0); >>       unregister_adapter_interrupt(&gib_alert_irq); >>       free_page((unsigned long)gib); >> @@ -3315,6 +3324,14 @@ int kvm_s390_gib_init(u8 nisc) >>           goto out_unreg_gal; >>       } >> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI) && sclp.has_aeni) { >> +        if (kvm_s390_pci_aen_init(nisc)) { >> +            pr_err("Initializing AEN for PCI failed\n"); >> +            rc = -EIO; >> +            goto out_unreg_gal; >> +        } >> +    } >> + >>       KVM_EVENT(3, "gib 0x%pK (nisc=%d) initialized", gib, gib->nisc); >>       goto out; >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> index 14a18ba5ff2c..9cd3c8eb59e8 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ >>   #include >>   #include "kvm-s390.h" >>   #include "gaccess.h" >> +#include "pci.h" >>   #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS >>   #include "trace.h" >> @@ -503,6 +504,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque) >>           goto out; >>       } >> +    kvm_s390_pci_init(); >> + >>       rc = kvm_s390_gib_init(GAL_ISC); >>       if (rc) >>           goto out; >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c >> index ecfc458a5b39..f0e5386ff943 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c >> @@ -10,6 +10,113 @@ >>   #include >>   #include >>   #include >> +#include "pci.h" >> + >> +static struct zpci_aift aift; >> + >> +static inline int __set_irq_noiib(u16 ctl, u8 isc) >> +{ >> +    union zpci_sic_iib iib = {{0}}; >> + >> +    return zpci_set_irq_ctrl(ctl, isc, &iib); >> +} >> + >> +struct zpci_aift *kvm_s390_pci_get_aift(void) >> +{ >> +    return &aift; >> +} >> + >> +/* Caller must hold the aift lock before calling this function */ >> +void kvm_s390_pci_aen_exit(void) >> +{ >> +    struct zpci_gaite *gait; >> +    unsigned long flags; >> +    struct airq_iv *sbv; >> +    struct kvm_zdev **gait_kzdev; >> +    int size; >> + >> +    /* Clear the GAIT and forwarding summary vector */ >> +    __set_irq_noiib(SIC_SET_AENI_CONTROLS, 0); > > Why don't we use the PCI ISC here? hum OK, sorry, isc is ignored for SIC_SET_AENI_CONTROLS > > ...snip... > -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen