Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA83DC4332F for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238865AbhLJNza (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:55:30 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:27255 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230296AbhLJNz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:55:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1639144313; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gqvyjGQ2QSbWFtIFlHWRbYHP8q8+IM6QnY9owpZHaBA=; b=Ce0kiUQkQ0MCuskCQn+mZL/Vtczoe3hoM761W3NgRnkmUqVZZSsVm1GtcNGnvmgHYNbG7w em8dRBsdJnuR5B82FQ4ktDmXQ05rGepUTjrCk5iXwKK02swmDeHR78LiBm2zD9XW03BV12 tv5N8rvTbBEx3z/a7UmVoDXImkYv0iM= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-292-Yiikw3VUM-K_xL9So-SoGA-1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:51:52 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Yiikw3VUM-K_xL9So-SoGA-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b3-20020a2ebc03000000b0021ffe75b14cso2929927ljf.5 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:51:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gqvyjGQ2QSbWFtIFlHWRbYHP8q8+IM6QnY9owpZHaBA=; b=VG9tiSMR13YVkA1321wzTVcCHh8XRw8UK5dhzux2/7BEgis6kfKIzvjP0mBVENoxDq UUWn6DM3WqBPr7vG1WwLqGAffkXVqw8FFHGmyspg7e/MYEQ+BTYir+Ghg5nWE2uCgbUT RpRm32VoToAxhmzUXQtJQHZndmBxFhnRNZCUCEWsH5/o4nAZ6ZzjS1dyC1QIxaQT//H1 KevDYMrTkNgw5py/zF1RsFSS9L/1lqwesvUKpiUlkP9u63p6Z4mTlGTucZ798w6dnWZO IXxBbCRYkQcD3cOArSj+fPDz2y1S1zLeCBV36non1E1hi3QWl6u1NwLUYmhVUmjz7+qX 6qTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530f4WP6RxnBFZMzLFUJDzk3fxZfFn+sxFsndyI46oDQ+Tqe8Tkk iE6s6ntwPAsqacEDWXXXoQBYBUdlnC6srHSeor8tEciM/By2bljVeFgvHaq8AHq0OVi1G0SRSSq iCn1L48OkkPR2LEhsC9xKhzMXcWfgxjnM5ojc+AVU X-Received: by 2002:a2e:141e:: with SMTP id u30mr12862184ljd.434.1639144311078; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:51:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUO/MrpzRbWn9dYPpab289atcuCRe9ccW1GgZxBAbufFTqh/0D7bN9PGcAdU9w0UtK4sR14DNLb2zrZaZr35U= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:141e:: with SMTP id u30mr12862154ljd.434.1639144310849; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:51:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210903152430.244937-1-nitesh@redhat.com> <87bl29l5c6.ffs@tglx> In-Reply-To: From: Nitesh Lal Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:51:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint() To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Juri Lelli , Dick Kennedy , Thomas Gleixner , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com, somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, huangguangbin2@huawei.com, huangdaode@huawei.com, Frederic Weisbecker , Alex Belits , Bjorn Helgaas , rostedt@goodmis.org, Peter Zijlstra , Jesse Brandeburg , Robin Murphy , Ingo Molnar , jbrandeb@kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, stephen@networkplumber.org, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, chris.friesen@windriver.com, Marc Zyngier , Neil Horman , pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com, Stefan Assmann , Tomas Henzl , james.smart@broadcom.com, Ken Cox , faisal.latif@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, Alaa Hleihel , Kamal Heib , borisp@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, "Nikolova, Tatyana E" , "Ismail, Mustafa" , Al Stone , Leon Romanovsky , Chandrakanth Patil , bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com, Petr Oros , Ming Lei , Ewan Milne , jejb@linux.ibm.com, kabel@kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , Jakub Kicinski , kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, Sumit Saxena , shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, sathya.prakash@broadcom.com, Sreekanth Reddy , suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com, ley.foon.tan@intel.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, snelson@pensando.io, lewis.hanly@microchip.com, benve@cisco.com, _govind@gmx.com, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Martin, On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:16 PM Nitesh Lal wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > Nitesh, > > > > On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 10:34, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > > >> > > >> The drivers currently rely on irq_set_affinity_hint() to either set the > > >> affinity_hint that is consumed by the userspace and/or to enforce a custom > > >> affinity. > > >> > > >> irq_set_affinity_hint() as the name suggests is originally introduced to > > >> only set the affinity_hint to help the userspace in guiding the interrupts > > >> and not the affinity itself. However, since the commit > > >> > > >> e2e64a932556 "genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()" > > > > sorry for ignoring this. It fell through the cracks. > > > No worries, thank you for reviewing. > > > > > > > >> Thomas Gleixner (1): > > >> genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints > > > > Did I actually write this? > > > Yeap, the idea and the initial patch came from you. :) > > > > > > > > Any suggestions on what should be the next steps here? Unfortunately, I haven't > > > been able to get any reviews on the following two patches: > > > be2net: Use irq_update_affinity_hint > > > hinic: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint > > > > > > One option would be to proceed with the remaining patches and I can try > > > posting these two again when I post patches for the remaining drivers? > > > > The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or > > whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of > > rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course. > > > > I am fine either way. > In the past, while I was asking for more testing help I was asked if the > SCSI changes are part of Martins's scsi-fixes tree as that's something > Broadcom folks test to check for regression. > So, maybe Martin can pull this up? > Gentle ping. Any thoughts on the above query? -- Thanks Nitesh