Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965005AbXAWOrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:47:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965161AbXAWOrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:47:01 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]:30333 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965005AbXAWOrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:47:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sBc5sQOJl7np4adVGokOBI0d70OlltVa53qhV+JSz8c2s+8OdsYUS7phbOf8DKDlNXNH8zK3dv/ypz5OczMd6rs1AacYwmJdQ5R6AbCcyMow4wamSnHp3C8JhkIg0jv8Jn57AurGMig44oQFhC/5QE+1iLOidn5/VTij7lJiFFA= Message-ID: <8355959a0701230646p72fb35e3je296f5c69b9d169@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:16:58 +0530 From: "Sunil Naidu" To: lkml Subject: Re: i965 testers wanted (Re: intel-agp PM experiences) Cc: "Pavel Machek" , andi@lisas.de, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, seife@suse.de In-Reply-To: <20070123094456.GG6033@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070116135727.GA2831@elf.ucw.cz> <20070116142432.GA6171@elf.ucw.cz> <20070117004012.GA11140@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20070117005755.GB6270@elf.ucw.cz> <20070118115105.GA28233@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20070118231650.GA5352@ucw.cz> <20070122044519.GA24398@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com> <20070123094456.GG6033@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1216 Lines: 36 On 1/23/07, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G machine, > > that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues Andreas > > has noted. It'll be good if more people could try this out. > > Ok, I guess we'd like some testing here... so that in can be fixed in > mainline... Pavel, It was same with me too, there were some ACPI issues (don't remember properly). http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/17/64 I am not getting enough time to do the tests for 965 board. I can volunteer for this ;-) Any guidelines for testing a MOBO to comply with LKML (am new for testing, have decided to start with this 965 MOBO). Awaiting for suggestions... [OT] Are there any issues with 975 (have this board too, but never tested till now) > Pavel Thanks, ~Akula2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/