Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914F6C433EF for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 18:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245547AbhLJSuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:50:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245544AbhLJSuS (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:50:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55927C061746; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id n26so9244250pff.3; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:46:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=08X8xmhfWg+7yMJFfsUm7qWwhAIHbNlPzGyyf5Wh3CY=; b=YybsEZ0Fg9aCk2Epw/G1jArcwPDq0QDjSjNjSXSOV6HojR+gH9ZOPmUY9mjJg0+/7Q uJEYNsJKPkPQpVeGHaKkjqYJAsM25/yO3mMs+msOhf7M7gJ1nXvQa7TrlVslYR3iJwgM D/MLShgb1+8p5J0WjHkTuu2104tHsgMBHiI47q8hGWPM2f0WG0tBjG/Y+JXDAJPKfcgf HIf3+DJx85s/VKMryuL7/5s+7w2yFQtxhKGFxb0JcwazNbvI0/JQ1eM+QBbXjImkvsCI 9Fkj3oo9IediIB+cV+5s8khR9RjsrLa3MAD3opv2CmzVYj1i34CUJHvdKbFrnbpRzHk3 /QcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=08X8xmhfWg+7yMJFfsUm7qWwhAIHbNlPzGyyf5Wh3CY=; b=thGibkdUWavurJDo2xvHqVIKFioN+5/ePXQSITupqd/wlv99uTPjpQneXdgjrXm1oa 173WiIi61XZY6lHMbj6Tc7y9jOESt2vTxfa04BR5bjBdwN3/qjQ1t3sQA8wNFHX/1Lc0 ljEhaucRKQsukkMAaAGDBh2ki7xo/ODjYOdUkUs6G2CXkiQSf1of8cGoO6OaZU6pDb5l +5XVNy2En/vbO0KHM3YYPqJumEVNAG/2dZdV8FobKHeJeV/ciPMt9p5KCpfaGX8NTREY tbPhOS8MUDQRRmVqBqUxWtkBJQl5BEOxGbVYfjSohqyXfRbfoolo0IAHUC226XSzH+Uo jB+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oNUjllVwRpW6don2wA/aaixBeVHb72V0wGdlA4txetgRWlSNg PGQ7PwK3MX3NRjSh2vRcovM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJnJU0QvSPetd3ZdZtqkbM2EwGty9WKttw4Li4qX/edNmXbFca4sAQSDltzF41gOcbqtTXYQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a1a:0:b0:4b0:9ff9:9f69 with SMTP id w26-20020aa79a1a000000b004b09ff99f69mr9653764pfj.26.1639162002763; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from stbsrv-and-01.and.broadcom.net ([192.19.11.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm4320334pfu.172.2021.12.10.10.46.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:46:42 -0800 (PST) From: Jim Quinlan To: Christoph Hellwig , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com Cc: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mathieu Poirier , devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: unittest: fix warning on PowerPC frame size warning Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:46:35 -0500 Message-Id: <20211210184636.7273-2-jim2101024@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20211210184636.7273-1-jim2101024@gmail.com> References: <20211210184636.7273-1-jim2101024@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The struct device variable "dev_bogus" was triggering this warning on a PowerPC build: drivers/of/unittest.c: In function 'of_unittest_dma_ranges_one.constprop': [...] >> The frame size of 1424 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] This variable is now dynamically allocated. Fixes: e0d072782c734 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 481ba8682ebf..02c5cd06ad19 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -911,11 +911,18 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path, if (!rc) { phys_addr_t paddr; dma_addr_t dma_addr; - struct device dev_bogus; + struct device *dev_bogus; - dev_bogus.dma_range_map = map; - paddr = dma_to_phys(&dev_bogus, expect_dma_addr); - dma_addr = phys_to_dma(&dev_bogus, expect_paddr); + dev_bogus = kzalloc(sizeof(struct device), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev_bogus) { + unittest(0, "kzalloc() failed\n"); + kfree(map); + return; + } + + dev_bogus->dma_range_map = map; + paddr = dma_to_phys(dev_bogus, expect_dma_addr); + dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev_bogus, expect_paddr); unittest(paddr == expect_paddr, "of_dma_get_range: wrong phys addr %pap (expecting %llx) on node %pOF\n", @@ -925,6 +932,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path, &dma_addr, expect_dma_addr, np); kfree(map); + kfree(dev_bogus); } of_node_put(np); #endif -- 2.17.1