Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45300C43219 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242509AbhLJTx3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:53:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231156AbhLJTx2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:53:28 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79751C0617A1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id z7so19884343lfi.11; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:49:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Fx2AxGyl7h70TiPIfAS4vLJoC4O4KHoawTu1bt5PLU=; b=V/Owe18bjaHxi/q9LMXS8LNROf16L9DCZYGpExoCj+SNTLCiSQNB3HcPLajV/NP5JE 39hqIvfIb3bc7xrS2E0EYCC3yAPKzLg7BnA0PumFQ89YOCGyLF9Ipz3BTISejc0ZvQJA z5FDAeVaX1e2/Z9TFGOO31SRX4KXbVNvKZ2tbYOwQTeu/RyJ9cs6xalps+Kn8iqrggDL HFUryH5SPjqHR6nW0F4ENPTnll1o3uJ7tQu3AMV7MUX+qx7nV3LMFjM06jk+Y2dJ7HtP J+zk+OszrogiRw5+RRL4W19jTgJEJXo+L0tNHRiDg9ofDsu8gJQpDKtlXAuJgOp4GYiB LSvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Fx2AxGyl7h70TiPIfAS4vLJoC4O4KHoawTu1bt5PLU=; b=0m2nazqEmMMp1ckjsVHQq7ZqF+bEWQpI/PXVwxALXj7VTaR4pePC/QpT3bYbB5TZ1c 3JEYBRO8rskfIuw+VcvdTRUbg/AD3W2RHn2h3CpwVtRDBaInUW2zPqyyObXH0zTEgm69 bydNMiR8Aq0HREUwIHDVCqs5YfTkLKhFa1e4nomavcz8Rx5WxnK/3JusLrTGrIxuI3Bf XKlxCO7jCNXUjc2F6KveZDDYLHBwr4M3G1E5v9svFx5QwtNUQzu58TW1h57YnDiarmSd fR2Qrwz0kdeRpyKN7SZA5AojIP43gRwccWqIo79GikpOu+3hN01Eih06K9FPtmXHs/9d FeGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BnbQuDPvr/E7mIHIEnkX7FRd0EV9VRy4S31qX+60qvIKTuC+u w7ZqfcD4CQkoZlzGsjR/CQigW8NzhcE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz32UCAa2RfOn9XCHx2JjAq/5XnkzKJ8mqE0CmU9Bnm8cg96K7fElVvubFW0G/2Bv0vNQ8r/g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:114a:: with SMTP id m10mr14457333lfg.188.1639165790431; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (94-29-46-111.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [94.29.46.111]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z24sm395757lfh.289.2021.12.10.11.49.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:49:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/25] reboot: Warn if restart handler has duplicated priority From: Dmitry Osipenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= Cc: Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Guo Ren , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Joshua Thompson , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Sebastian Reichel , Linus Walleij , Philipp Zabel , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , the arch/x86 maintainers , "H. Peter Anvin" , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Len Brown , Santosh Shilimkar , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Pavel Machek , Lee Jones , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Daniel Lezcano , Andy Shevchenko , Ulf Hansson , alankao@andestech.com, "K . C . Kuen-Chern Lin" , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Linux-sh list , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM , linux-tegra References: <20211126180101.27818-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20211126180101.27818-6-digetx@gmail.com> <033ddf2a-6223-1a82-ec64-30f17c891f67@gmail.com> <091321ea-4919-0579-88a8-23d05871575d@gmail.com> <45025b2d-4be1-f694-be61-31903795cf5d@gmail.com> <45228c88-4d51-591e-5da5-9ec468e71684@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7875d10b-0d9b-ca29-668b-630ea3650fd0@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:49:47 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 10.12.2021 22:44, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 10.12.2021 22:42, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > ... >>>> There is no strong requirement for priorities to be unique, the reboot.c >>>> code will work properly. >>> >>> In which case adding the WARN() is not appropriate IMV. >>> >>> Also I've looked at the existing code and at least in some cases the >>> order in which the notifiers run doesn't matter. I'm not sure what >>> the purpose of this patch is TBH. >> >> The purpose is to let developer know that driver needs to be corrected. >> >>>> The potential problem is on the user's side and the warning is intended >>>> to aid the user. >>> >>> Unless somebody has the panic_on_warn mentioned previously set and >>> really the user need not understand what the WARN() is about. IOW, >>> WARN() helps developers, not users. >>> >>>> We can make it a strong requirement, but only after converting and >>>> testing all kernel drivers. >>> >>> Right. >>> >>>> I'll consider to add patches for that. >>> >>> But can you avoid adding more patches to this series? >> >> I won't add more patches since such patches can be added only after >> completion of transition to the new API of the whole kernel. >> > > Thank you for the review. > I meant you, Rafael, and Michał, just in case :)