Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF8FC433EF for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345566AbhLKBf1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:35:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41398 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229633AbhLKBf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:35:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C28AC061714; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:31:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id x15so35925906edv.1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:31:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6CwkmUHS8TUHgTHQZNO355pdijNlHV5S9aFWvQgQHZc=; b=OiDVhdsbVRCuDETU8Jt6+FuOiQjFOC+k7wpNLaCz4sJSWtd8cNMPW/OSqx5JHMZywf 66nhFTgu9cJj9d/tuqVTfQot94a+kAP7cAfqToBiDEzL+LowR9H2VgVKz4g/kxDWqYp0 ROExg3sIBVD/KUWQoXq2Dn9GeBlyz6iaN0zHr+zhKDz/Qag6ApPyBnvUoO3/j75AUBOs GoKG3xvSD1+1PH5uSPxHaZ2ANT5Aqom+R4IDgB7vf/HeVhjArUxZDaM0wfukMgvO9yWp 52ltPnwjEc6clVIubgkJSCxRRyoaZfiYHn0PGAk6brMuX0ORFrHd05qkAQjrGY2P5gjk L8hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6CwkmUHS8TUHgTHQZNO355pdijNlHV5S9aFWvQgQHZc=; b=FbOrDKxmVbmBJW2u9Qi20l1v+mns7eTp4QeuZDI4Iavtrwb2i5LDDqDKOM7PQERmNI BKPsybWzFkYmAdonYhaRuCTeLOyekVhM2TqfiNtmrCZ/5DxRqjyiIJ3mY5xKmkG9laG4 CSSQ2jWaPzvQ9VEfGbzzb8btxb61GvRXX22MzxONffbTBXMS6/ciO5Rt8NGUgvfDtGd+ jbl3z8+3sjEMZwrIEC3h32zauTsq6tW9HKZ77crz54W7gBtktSnj8A2gwWHWZIb3mOBC vC4TKHj/Y+T5S+H1BEfr42E3ojnqC0DfIA6mGTfPPuh6Z507yNG3hyE5+NpaY0IqEaP0 MFlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Obq2I2pQszW/GVYEHJfW3M5r2h6qlyj69gmfLcfrHZZcDZC2r bVGv9ckmqucOObh+oQKTSzc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCxqvJ6GZJzbGQQpnAw4qJuopDImyNSu1ryY4/V5cbxSPQ8cU/s1spdusvRQVvjOCkLKpASw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:26cb:: with SMTP id x11mr43166963edd.149.1639186308429; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:31:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:48f9:bea:a04c:3dfe? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:48f9:bea:a04c:3dfe]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cy26sm2245602edb.7.2021.12.10.17.31.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:31:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <87c26050-9242-e6fb-3fce-b6bde815f76a@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:31:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/19] kvm: x86: Save and restore guest XFD_ERR properly Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Gleixner , Yang Zhong , x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Cc: seanjc@google.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, jing2.liu@linux.intel.com, jing2.liu@intel.com References: <20211208000359.2853257-1-yang.zhong@intel.com> <20211208000359.2853257-16-yang.zhong@intel.com> <87pmq4vw54.ffs@tglx> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <87pmq4vw54.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/21 01:10, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > 2) When the guest triggers #NM is takes an VMEXIT and the host > does: > > rdmsrl(MSR_XFD_ERR, vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err); > > injects the #NM and goes on. > > 3) When the guest writes to MSR_XFD_ERR it takes an VMEXIT and > the host does: > > vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err = msrval; > wrmsrl(MSR_XFD_ERR, msrval); No wrmsrl here I think, the host value is 0 and should stay so. Instead the wrmsrl will happen the next time the VCPU loop is entred. Paolo