Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51387C433EF for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 03:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232798AbhLLD5q (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:57:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229799AbhLLD5p (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:57:45 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED82AC061714 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 19:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF03B80CA7 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 03:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61529C341C5; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 03:57:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1639281462; bh=3b2f975Yr0NoyS8/5uW8nsUdleLfQXmWbNrzTrKg5y4=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YXv/tS5gH2+yXsvr5jqJYvTZzpSHIyTReGm+LYD5MqA21s3NkzufmNUCahzAA+T9m Ry+jyJfWZg478kUstven7STUbNfdRHGS+HiAuHivFWt/Pyvm3yQ0DLmpZIstD2IlpA y5N9+Lt6Q7+nMAQDnP9G70UP+CHcgMzISPzazMMQAL05w5EQSPCd+sEgLut1rx+Pie SSd/bhMdc6mtKzHpb1GEefr5wVMwJLWJ1JeLuVK8YaeDqFNhrGoj8fgqY+Hj0Ekilh bVIdifO14RSLg+Z9zzGaQpgseDvB+j01cCJ/cvs88WlWQq7JgbRL+KfhuXSC/Ofh4f jHa1J3cqwvdQg== Message-ID: <96959788-73b2-6e9b-3aa7-b1e23e9da417@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:57:38 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: skip f2fs_preallocate_blocks() for overwrite case Content-Language: en-US From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20210928151911.11189-1-chao@kernel.org> <65f6c366-9e5b-fe7f-7c38-061996d1882b@kernel.org> <3e653a3d-ddb9-e115-d871-3659a1ba5530@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <3e653a3d-ddb9-e115-d871-3659a1ba5530@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ping, On 2021/10/30 11:02, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/10/30 1:43, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> On 10/29, Chao Yu wrote: >>> Ping, >>> >>> On 2021/9/29 8:05, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/9/29 3:08, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> On 09/28, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>> In f2fs_file_write_iter(), let's use f2fs_overwrite_io() to >>>>>> check whethere it is overwrite case, for such case, we can skip >>>>>> f2fs_preallocate_blocks() in order to avoid f2fs_do_map_lock(), >>>>>> which may be blocked by checkpoint() potentially. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>>>> --- >>>>>>    fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 ++++ >>>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>> index 13deae03df06..51fecb2f4db5 100644 >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>>> @@ -4321,6 +4321,10 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) >>>>>>            preallocated = true; >>>>>>            target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from); >>>>>> +        if (f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, iocb->ki_pos, >>>>>> +                        iov_iter_count(from))) >>>>>> +            goto write; >>>>> >>>>> This calls f2fs_map_blocks() which can be duplicate, if it's not the overwirte >>>>> case. Do we have other benefit? >>>> >>>> f2fs_overwrite_io() will break for append write case w/ below check: >>>> >>>>       if (pos + len > i_size_read(inode)) >>>>           return false; >>>> >>>> I guess we may only suffer double f2fs_map_blocks() for write hole >>>> case, e.g. truncate to large size & write inside the filesize. For >>>> this case, how about adding a condition to allow double f2fs_map_blocks() >>>> only if write size is smaller than a threshold? >> >> I still don't see the benefit much to do double f2fs_map_blocks. What is the >> problem here? > > There is potential hangtask happened during swapfile's writeback: > > - loop_kthread_worker_fn >  - kthread_worker_fn >   - loop_queue_work >    - lo_rw_aio >     - f2fs_file_write_iter >      - f2fs_preallocate_blocks >       - f2fs_map_blocks >        - down_read >         - rwsem_down_read_slowpath >          - schedule > > I try to mitigate such issue by preallocating swapfile's block address and > avoid f2fs_do_map_lock() as much as possible in swapfile's writeback path... > > Thanks, > >> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>>            err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from); >>>>>>            if (err) { >>>>>>    out_err: >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.32.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-f2fs-devel&data=04%7C01%7Cchao.yu%40oppo.com%7Cbb41006c3f6d4e4d600a08d99b51cbcd%7Cf1905eb1c35341c5951662b4a54b5ee6%7C0%7C0%7C637711597895400286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BlEAXWLpV5wGX2hL0Wj5p2qX0AqfUFI05Qiqdp8PK8g%3D&reserved=0 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel