Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:07:40 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
        tony@atomide.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
        yj.chiang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/5] memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory
 map
Message-ID: <YbcNXBj+FIwuQd/8@kroah.com>
References: <20211213085710.28962-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211213085710.28962-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:57:05PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
> When linux memory is not aligned with page block size and have hole in zone,
> the 5.4-lts arm kernel might crash in move_freepages() as Kefen Wang reported in [1].
> Backport the upstream fix commits by Mike Rapoport [2] to 5.4 can fix this issue.
> 
> And free_unused_memmap() of arm and arm64 are moved to generic mm/memblock in
> the below upstream commit, so I applied the first two patches to free_unused_memmap()
> in arch/arm/mm/init.c.
> 
> (4f5b0c178996 arm, arm64: move free_unused_memmap() to generic mm)
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2a1592ad-bc9d-4664-fd19-f7448a37edc0@huawei.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org/#t
> 
> Mike Rapoport (5):
>   memblock: free_unused_memmap: use pageblock units instead of MAX_ORDER
>   memblock: align freed memory map on pageblock boundaries with
>     SPARSEMEM
>   memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region()
>   arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment
>   arm: ioremap: don't abuse pfn_valid() to check if pfn is in RAM
> 
>  arch/arm/mm/init.c    | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c |  4 +++-
>  mm/memblock.c         |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

These look like they also are required in 5.10.y as well, right?  Please
also provide a backported series for that tree, we can not have users
moving to a newer kernel version and having regressions.

I can't take this series until then, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h