Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D41C433F5 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241826AbhLMKFt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:05:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:35526 "EHLO mail-ot1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240395AbhLMKBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:01:09 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x43-20020a056830246b00b00570d09d34ebso16885064otr.2 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 02:01:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XeBMiuDdEV6Ne7aU6TPbb3k+NoeyXfYTUvJrW81TPQE=; b=CiI19V6pHxGRsG/VGZ0leBQ+9b2JJlOP5pVKWqgi/bzz7cbzlTLiosDnhnQiqxY4ng JiPo2Awl5Tj3apo0xdGdg1RLkX9vnP+1aMv0P+ce3iwQorEHC5AxoX1AJBZFr+nU+N+Y S4X7ORcv1xCNDRJB7NVzVR9h3fL8UuZduGrzYVUObMd2SOAE+GaWB0BSeV0M5uWKu7rp wzXaAJze+owHXEjTNCPAPFO5qR4948CtRAYIQvdOVH1IvJzB5jKhI72NDDfipS3AvfIL Hffsg7Fc2hg/proqF29hc9PTLsphAnXUkSlNwS7iATuTmk18Wcm8aS0nTiDvLA5fA9cO O5qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dC5JjHO3Cu/6q3mYqDllEEe8hXor4CwOgjR28xMqmOdP+Goox vzl4L00LFUEIGOLCeeryKsQLhBX/M+oS/BRHHJY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/xWBZHNyXQEkpfirFVAdJz/pnZ6bqZbBigO7Uzma7RKqwr/vlINyJ34STv6jBDdc3AC4qewM9tEiCM5PhuJc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4c10:: with SMTP id l16mr24537577otf.198.1639389668140; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 02:01:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211211163327.3093169-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20211211163327.3093169-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:00:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: intel_epb: Allow model specific normal EPB value To: Srinivas Pandruvada Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:33 PM Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > The current EPB "normal" is defined as 6 and set whenever power-up EPB > value is 0. This setting resulted in the desired out of box power and > performance for several CPU generations. But this value is not suitable > for AlderLake mobile CPUs, as this resulted in higher uncore power. > Since EPB is model specific, this is not unreasonable to have different > behavior. > > Allow a capability where "normal" EPB can be redefined. For AlderLake > mobile CPUs this desired normal value is 7. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c > index f4dd73396f28..fbaf12e43f41 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -58,6 +59,22 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, saved_epb); > #define EPB_SAVED 0x10ULL > #define MAX_EPB EPB_MASK > > +enum energy_perf_value_index { > + EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE, > + EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE, > + EPB_INDEX_NORMAL, > + EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE, > + EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE, > +}; > + > +static u8 energ_perf_values[] = { > + [EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE, > + [EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE, > + [EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL, > + [EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_POWERSAVE, > + [EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_POWERSAVE, > +}; > + > static int intel_epb_save(void) > { > u64 epb; > @@ -90,7 +107,7 @@ static void intel_epb_restore(void) > */ > val = epb & EPB_MASK; > if (val == ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE) { > - val = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL; > + val = energ_perf_values[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL]; > pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'\n"); > } > } > @@ -103,18 +120,11 @@ static struct syscore_ops intel_epb_syscore_ops = { > }; > > static const char * const energy_perf_strings[] = { > - "performance", > - "balance-performance", > - "normal", > - "balance-power", > - "power" > -}; > -static const u8 energ_perf_values[] = { > - ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE, > - ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE, > - ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL, > - ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_POWERSAVE, > - ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_POWERSAVE > + [EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = "performance", > + [EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] = "balance-performance", > + [EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = "normal", > + [EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = "balance-power", > + [EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = "power", > }; > > static ssize_t energy_perf_bias_show(struct device *dev, > @@ -193,13 +203,22 @@ static int intel_epb_offline(unsigned int cpu) > return 0; > } > > +static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_epb_normal[] = { > + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_L, 7), > + {} > +}; > + > static __init int intel_epb_init(void) > { > + const struct x86_cpu_id *id = x86_match_cpu(intel_epb_normal); > int ret; > > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB)) > return -ENODEV; > > + if (id) > + energ_perf_values[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = id->driver_data; > + > ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_INTEL_EPB_ONLINE, > "x86/intel/epb:online", intel_epb_online, > intel_epb_offline); > -- > 2.31.1 >