Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:51:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:51:31 -0500 Received: from mx2out.umbc.edu ([130.85.253.52]:54450 "EHLO mx2out.umbc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:51:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:51:26 -0500 From: John Jasen X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, John Jasen wrote: > Making a more stripped 2.4.14 now, and will post results and .config in > the same directory as everything else. ehhh ... same results. Interestingly enough, a few people posted and emailed that they hade no problems with their SiS630E chipsets, and offering various theories therein. My vendor had a SiS630E board that was going to be RMA'd (broken ps/2 port for mouse of all damned things), so he quickly built a system around it, I ssh'ed in, copied over 2.4.14, and make dep took a whopping 37 seconds or so, with make (on a .config with everything either added in or as a module) about 6.5 minutes. So, no, whatever magic molassas infects my SiS630 boards does not seem to extend to the SiS630E. -- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/