MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211204195757.8600-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
 <20211204195757.8600-4-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> <e9472cec-7aca-92c4-6184-f442c0f88d56@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9472cec-7aca-92c4-6184-f442c0f88d56@canonical.com>
From:   Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:31:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4kWmSK7rmUO-bBj-U=JyGWWgguBL2dLa6KCbX6q5CJshA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] tty: serial: samsung: Remove USI initialization
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
        David Virag <virag.david003@gmail.com>,
        Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 13:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2021 20:57, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > USI control is now extracted to the dedicated USI driver. Remove USI
> > related code from serial driver to avoid conflicts and code duplication.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> >   - Spell check fixes in commit message
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - (none)
> >
> >  drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 36 ++++----------------------------
> >  include/linux/serial_s3c.h       |  9 --------
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Does this patch depend on USI driver? In cover letter you did not
> mention any dependency, so this can go via Greg's tree, right?
>

Hi Krzysztof,

TL;DR: Serial patches from this series don't really depend on USI
driver and can go via Greg's tree.

I'd say ideally those should be applied right after USI driver
patches. Because otherwise we'd have double initialization of USI
block (from USI driver and from serial driver), which wasn't tested
and may lead to not functional USI (though I think it should be fine).
That's why I decided to keep those in one single patch series. But if
we don't care about some short period of not tested behavior -- then
those can go via Greg's tree.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof