Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D51C433EF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238182AbhLMN6A (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:58:00 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:55750 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233782AbhLMN57 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:57:59 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817131FB; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.7.82] (unknown [10.57.7.82]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 217533F73B; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:57:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf expr: Fix return value of ids__new To: Miaoqian Lin Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Andi Kleen , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <864ad02d-6afe-791c-f742-56582b633482@arm.com> <20211213070956.15119-1-linmq006@gmail.com> From: German Gomez Message-ID: <34713bd7-1464-95a3-b9ba-c27a56948560@arm.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:57:46 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211213070956.15119-1-linmq006@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message appeared in my client as a separate thread, but it seems to be a reply to a message from a different thread: "In-Reply-To: <864ad02d-6afe-791c-f742-56582b633482@arm.com>" On 13/12/2021 07:09, Miaoqian Lin wrote: > callers of ids__new() function only do NULL checking for the return > value. ids__new() calles hashmap__new(), which may return > ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). Instead of changing the checking one-by-one. > return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) to keep > consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin > --- > tools/perf/util/expr.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c > index 1d532b9fed29..aabdc112300c 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c > @@ -65,7 +65,13 @@ static bool key_equal(const void *key1, const void *key2, > > struct hashmap *ids__new(void) > { > - return hashmap__new(key_hash, key_equal, NULL); > + struct hashmap *hash; > + > + hash = hashmap__new(key_hash, key_equal, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(hash)) > + return NULL; > + else > + return hash; > } > > void ids__free(struct hashmap *ids)