Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBCFC433EF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 18:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241900AbhLMScC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:32:02 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:34028 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234465AbhLMScB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:32:01 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613C66D; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:32:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.34.138] (e127744.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.34.138]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 494113F793; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:31:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] perf script: Add "struct machine" parameter to process_event callback To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Athira Rajeev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, John Garry , Will Deacon , Mathieu Poirier , Leo Yan , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org References: <20211201123334.679131-1-german.gomez@arm.com> <20211201123334.679131-3-german.gomez@arm.com> <38fd4992-63ae-4871-ddfd-27d40b5c48d2@arm.com> From: German Gomez Message-ID: <73ecfe08-f38b-1308-40b5-a1a778323bf5@arm.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 18:31:47 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/12/2021 18:22, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > [...] > >> Thanks for the suggestion. It looks like we can skip this patch if we >> can get the arch value that way. > So the first one is already upstream, will you post a v2? > > - Arnaldo Hi Arnaldo, I sent a v2 where this patch was removed. The upstreamed patch (1/4 here) remained the same. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211207180653.1147374-1-german.gomez@arm.com/