Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C6C433FE for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242232AbhLMTax (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55192 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230154AbhLMTaw (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:52 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FE4C061574; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6282E611E0; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2A17C34600; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:30:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1639423850; bh=YCIulPuC7rz/g+20RoE3fcDBtrYWE3Qufvo06cYhoUs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=NzSBW4b4YioKli+ClrzJcc6U6jeGIiTCn5lSYpzRYJY/UC4hLUxHzuZiz8P6mx6Sx gNrLTOJ9/UjQH0PYjuCkcwdGCqw1lkYu3EaL0KayS+7fsmsODlpG82MgC56cmK2Mql kM2SNWYBQaLhXnFzljumqfj9BYYhELC//tEgFz32JZLdh/slGPz/HHyjfPbgoA2HPc HUV/ohrsPGPyXS1o4RXN6PFqlqLvaXBUyg0DQuATmEj1vLSOnhrvc0rWQQLkmdRER9 SMBeXrMqirdXDf2LPsEcHSC+qSoyLU9UfxoAndKYECV4Ox7gQfza/ZhCev7gHVHUWH zJiITef16s25g== Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id w1so55484998edc.6; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:30:50 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ETaKAMfLREdyUnqXpXeXabpEN9xybcLI5q9Jd7iiOlCDFJm61 7jRQjn3SJeACsermt6dD4K3vdGtDx+sch5IUFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy++oHUM39e5Ms27cPmoi1TEiua3mJxb9d2Rx+2TgB+kXwcivxSMb5bFNJbaNDO7q7u0b1xHbIR//4B6RpjTC8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b18:: with SMTP id g24mr357822ejf.27.1639423849162; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:30:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1638864419-17501-1-git-send-email-wellslutw@gmail.com> <1638864419-17501-2-git-send-email-wellslutw@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rob Herring Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:30:36 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] devicetree: bindings: net: Add bindings doc for Sunplus SP7021. To: =?UTF-8?B?5ZGC6Iqz6aiw?= Cc: David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Philipp Zabel , Wells Lu , Vincent Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:35 PM =E5=91=82=E8=8A=B3=E9=A8=B0 wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thank you very much for your review. > Please see my replies below: > > > Add bindings documentation for Sunplus SP7021. > > > [...] > > > + > > > + interrupts: > > > + description: | > > > + Contains number and type of interrupt. Number should be 66. > > > > Drop. That's every 'interrupts' and the exact number is outside the > > scope of the binding. > > Yes, I'll drop the descriptions next patch. > interrupts property will be: > > interrupts: > maxItems: 1 > > > [...] > > > + > > > + mdio: > > > > Just need: > > > > $ref: mdio.yaml# > > unevaluatedProperties: false > > > > and drop the rest. > > Yes, I'll modify mdio node next patch. > mdio node will be: > > mdio: > $ref: mdio.yaml# > unevaluatedProperties: false > > > > > + type: object > > > + description: external MDIO Bus > > > + > > > + properties: > > > + "#address-cells": > > > + const: 1 > > > + > > > + "#size-cells": > > > + const: 0 > > > + > > > + patternProperties: > > > + "^ethernet-phy@[0-9a-f]+$": > > > + type: object > > > + description: external PHY node > > > + > > > + properties: > > > + reg: > > > + minimum: 0 > > > + maximum: 30 > > Can I limit value of 'reg' to no more than 30? Isn't that the limit for any MDIO bus? I guess normally 31 is also valid? I'm not really sure it is worth adding just for that 1 possible value. Within the range of valid addresses, we can't ever validate that a DT has the correct address. Rob