Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BBEC433FE for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240291AbhLMWf6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:35:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232134AbhLMWf4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:35:56 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A70C061748 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id i13so5456468ilk.13 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:35:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DBnoK0OyUlLAOuBvNnnmeaqng0RVQtz+D/6i7hX6jWw=; b=Bhm14wsvKoSI0/zY2t5qbEGLX3rimfq0X7e4D6CRc/EBSTiB9tyTe1TdneBiH5ffsk UaeScdmpN34MTic0smNzK4HLAIrGz4HI1eUbvWWeSWJJf5YBvXR8/Izobn+xDc23SYhN u9/bNysjKr+Xj/qpL/UTFhyJZLm2uKT4zI95Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DBnoK0OyUlLAOuBvNnnmeaqng0RVQtz+D/6i7hX6jWw=; b=rwM/VxHg6jdPfAQzEJNfDDVbwj7cilUE01zq7gBMnR1j/oCtIt+EkXP0aZIko7Cymh OWVmQ193T+iXekol+PztsentA3UUFJTEkdZzPkSYubDygKdQHTKAQ/wjyTy5D6STE+Bp 5Vb4Agutcgh4v3x5eHGKvuWee7vUCoyT+CKycjWKOdDTu3aP8m0AkCeJmiQq0WoCeaE4 e2C1SH7ShVlHO+RBwDRoaAqhaXwucpQtNYoDTIpObZHZfB+lXvW0snLn/++tL9NGWw9i 1u64ZBxVEZdHn/6U2vaJt2y7q4OQy8eZIrVSLRS5VeCxmELCdlBJQANrjLAwAy6jLXBs aw4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HU8IdkY4vXfKe9/EL8EBlqUolBolP5QXXqD6sJ6DCLFqGX627 YByprL70acUcASPV7kmLf7QiKQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiXtBZAbBl/VCDVBUa2jlIRWHm5zgggZp0SD5B9ipv2ZOn3XqoayIO2zQUgkFfP9euHt3vmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1c85:: with SMTP id w5mr978973ill.272.1639434955349; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.22.22.4] (c-73-185-129-58.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [73.185.129.58]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm7681208iob.7.2021.12.13.14.35.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:35:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:35:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/7] Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare Engine(DCC) for SM8150,SC7280,SC7180,SDM845 Content-Language: en-US To: Souradeep Chowdhury , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sai Prakash Ranjan , Sibi Sankar , Rajendra Nayak , vkoul@kernel.org References: From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/10/21 12:54 PM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote: > DCC(Data Capture and Compare) is a DMA engine designed for debugging purposes.In case of a system > crash or manual software triggers by the user the DCC hardware stores the value at the register > addresses which can be used for debugging purposes.The DCC driver provides the user with sysfs > interface to configure the register addresses.The options that the DCC hardware provides include > reading from registers,writing to registers,first reading and then writing to registers and looping > through the values of the same register. I realize this was posted a long time ago but I spent a little time on it today, and I have some comments for you to consider. You'll need to post another version of this series if you're going to address some of my comments. Most of the comments are in patch 2, which contains all the code and the sysfs documentation. I have no comments on patches 3 (MAINTAINERS update) or 4 through 7 (DTS updates for specific platforms). First, a few comments on this cover page. The most trivial comment is: Please make your lines narrower than 80 columns, like the rest of the patches. I appreciate that this goes into some detail about how this feature has been used. But I think it could benefit from a little better high-level overview of what it *does*. Your first paragraph is a concise summary, but I find it doesn't evoke a model in my mind of what exactly is going on, or what the hardware is doing. In fact, if you can provide a good high-level overview it might belong at the top of "dcc.c" in comments. Looking at the code (but not in any great depth), I see that there are "linked lists" of what appear to be things for the hardware to do with memory when this hardware is "triggered." If I understand it right, there can be up to 8 of these lists (though some versions of hardware might advertise the number supported via a register). If the following is wrong, I hope you'll offer a comparable explanation and will correct my misunderstanding. Each list consists of a set of actions to take. The actions available include: reading a register (possibly times in succession); writing a register; and read/modify/writing a register (affecting only bits in a given mask). Actually, the way looping works is a little confusing to me. Each list can be enabled and disabled separately. When triggered, all lists are executed, and (somehow) the result is saved into a buffer that can be read via /dev/dcc_sram. So you use these sysfs files to configure the actions you'd like to take when a "trigger" is signaled. The content of /dev/dcc_sram can then be read to see what output your lists produced. Is that close to correct? If it is, great; I want to be sure I understand what the hardware is supposed to do before I comment much more on the way you represent it in the driver and in sysfs. > In certain cases a register write needs to be executed for accessing the rest of the registers, > also the user might want to record the changing values of a register with time for which he has the > option to use the loop feature. > > The options mentioned above are exposed to the user by sysfs files once the driver is probed.The > details and usage of this sysfs files are documented in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc. Once you've confirmed I understand what's supposed to happen when the trigger fires, I think I'll have some comments on the way you represent the actions in these lists. But for now, maybe keep things as you have them, but address some of the comments I'm giving you today. Copy me on future revisions and I'll plan to review again. OK, that's enough on this file for now. Onto the binding and the code... -Alex > As an example let us consider a couple of debug scenarios where DCC has been proved to be effective > for debugging purposes:- > > i)TimeStamp Related Issue > > On SC7180, there was a coresight timestamp issue where it would occasionally be all 0 instead of proper > timestamp values. > > Proper timestamp: > Idx:3373; ID:10; I_TIMESTAMP : Timestamp.; Updated val = 0x13004d8f5b7aa; CC=0x9e > > Zero timestamp: > Idx:3387; ID:10; I_TIMESTAMP : Timestamp.; Updated val = 0x0; CC=0xa2 > > Now this is a non-fatal issue and doesn't need a system reset, but still needs > to be rootcaused and fixed for those who do care about coresight etm traces. > Since this is a timestamp issue, we would be looking for any timestamp related > clocks and such. > > o we get all the clk register details from IP documentation and configure it > via DCC config syfs node. Before that we set the current linked list. > > /* Set the current linked list */ > echo 3 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/curr_list > > /* Program the linked list with the addresses */ > echo 0x10c004 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config > echo 0x10c008 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config > echo 0x10c00c > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config > echo 0x10c010 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config > ..... and so on for other timestamp related clk registers > > /* Other way of specifying is in "addr len" pair, in below case it > specifies to capture 4 words starting 0x10C004 */ > > echo 0x10C004 4 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/config > > /* Enable DCC */ > echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/enable > > /* Run the timestamp test for working case */ > > /* Send SW trigger */ > echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/trigger > > /* Read SRAM */ > cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram1.bin > > /* Run the timestamp test for non-working case */ > > /* Send SW trigger */ > echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/10a2000.dcc/trigger > > /* Read SRAM */ > cat /dev/dcc_sram > dcc_sram2.bin > > Get the parser from [1] and checkout the latest branch. > > /* Parse the SRAM bin */ > python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram1.bin --v2 -o output/ > python dcc_parser.py -s dcc_sram2.bin --v2 -o output/ > > Sample parsed output of dcc_sram1.bin: > > > 03/14/21 > Linux DCC Parser > > > > > > > next_ll_offset : 0x1c > > > ii)NOC register errors > > A particular class of registers called NOC which are functional registers was reporting > errors while logging the values.To trace these errors the DCC has been used effectively. > The steps followed were similar to the ones mentioned above. > In addition to NOC registers a few other dependent registers were configured in DCC to > monitor it's values during a crash. A look at the dependent register values revealed that > the crash was happening due to a secured access to one of these dependent registers. > All these debugging activity and finding the root cause was achieved using DCC. > > DCC parser is available at the following open source location > > https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/tools/tree/dcc_parser > > Changes in v6: > > *Added support in the dcc driver to handle multiple Qualcomm SoCs including SC7180,SC7280,SDM845 > along with existing SM8150. > > *Added the support node in the respective device tree files for SC7180,SC7280,SDM845. > > Souradeep Chowdhury (7): > dt-bindings: Added the yaml bindings for DCC > soc: qcom: dcc:Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare > unit(DCC) > MAINTAINERS: Add the entry for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver > support > arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support > node > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support > node > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support > node > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add Data Capture and Compare(DCC) support > node > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc | 114 ++ > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml | 43 + > MAINTAINERS | 8 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 6 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 6 + > drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c | 1549 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 10 files changed, 1747 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-dcc > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,dcc.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/dcc.c >