Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751598AbXAXOkN (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:40:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751604AbXAXOkN (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:40:13 -0500 Received: from amsfep19-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.16]:59225 "EHLO amsfep11-int.chello.nl" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbXAXOkL (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:40:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]: Fix BUG in cancel_dirty_pages on XFS From: Peter Zijlstra To: Nick Piggin Cc: David Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <45B7627B.8050202@yahoo.com.au> References: <20070123223702.GF33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> <1169640835.6189.14.camel@twins> <45B7627B.8050202@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:40:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1169649604.6189.27.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1632 Lines: 44 On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 00:43 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Have you seen the new launder_page() a_op? called from > > invalidate_inode_pages2_range() > > It would have been nice to make that one into a more potentially > useful generic callback. That can still be done when the need arises, right? > But why was it introduced, exactly? I can't tell from the code or > the discussion why NFS couldn't start the IO, and signal the caller > to wait_on_page_writeback and retry? That seemed to me like the > convetional fix. to quote a bit: On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:19:38 -0500 Trond Myklebust wrote: > NFS: Fix race in nfs_release_page() > > invalidate_inode_pages2() may set the dirty bit on a page owing to the call > to unmap_mapping_range() after the page was locked. In order to fix this, > NFS has hooked the releasepage() method. This, however leads to deadlocks > in other parts of the VM. and: > > Now, arguably the VM shouldn't be calling try_to_release_page() with > > __GFP_FS when it's holding a lock on a page. > > > > But otoh, NFS should never be running lock_page() within nfs_release_page() > > against the page which was passed into nfs_release_page(). It'll deadlock > > for sure. > > The reason why it is happening is that the last dirty page from that > inode gets cleaned, resulting in a call to dput(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/