Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751886AbXAXO73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:59:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751906AbXAXO73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:59:29 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:40555 "EHLO omx1.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751886AbXAXO72 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:59:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:58:42 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Nick Piggin cc: Peter Zijlstra , Aubrey Li , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Robin Getz , "Henn, erich, Michael" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Limit the size of the pagecache In-Reply-To: <45B7561C.9000102@yahoo.com.au> Message-ID: References: <1169625333.4493.16.camel@taijtu> <45B7561C.9000102@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 616 Lines: 14 On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > I can't argue that a smaller pagecache will be subject to a > higher turnaround given the same workload, but I don't know why > that would be a good thing. Neither do I. Wonder why we need this but I keep getting these requests. Could we either find a reason for limiting the pagecache or get this out of our system for good? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/