Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:13:56 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Cc:     arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@beaconembedded.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions
Message-ID: <20211214031356.GA10916@dragon>
References: <20211128131853.15125-1-aford173@gmail.com>
 <CAHCN7x+yOs3icCV2OsKwAPRcov4Cb9Q+K8b2oy7WZowb3YZnRA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHCN7x+yOs3icCV2OsKwAPRcov4Cb9Q+K8b2oy7WZowb3YZnRA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:19 AM Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The i.MX8M Nano is similar to the i.MX8M Mini in some ways, but very
> > different in others.  With the blk-ctrl driver for Mini in place,
> > this series expands the blk-ctrl driver to support the Nano which
> > opens the door for additional functions in the future.  As part of
> > this series, it also addresses some issues in the GPCv2 driver and
> > finally adds support for enabling USB and GPU.
> >
> > V4:  Rebase on top of [1] which fixes hangs caused from CSI and DSI reset
> >      and add the same fixes for CSI and DSI to the Nano
> > V3:  Fixes an the yaml example
> > V2:  Fixes the clock count in the blk-ctrl
> >
> > [1] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg936266.html
> >
> 
> Shawn,
> 
> This series should apply cleanly against your tree now that [1] has
> been applied to your tree.  Should I submit this a resend or are you
> able to test the build now?

I haven't seen any comments on this series from Lucas.

Shawn