Message-ID: <21e7bb02-1d02-21f2-159d-71ca6529bb66@didichuxing.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:13:18 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC] cgroup: support numabalancing disable in
 cgroup level
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>, <tj@kernel.org>
CC:     <bristot@redhat.com>, <bsegall@google.com>,
        <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <jameshongleiwang@126.com>,
        <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
        <peterz@infradead.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
From:   Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>
In-Reply-To: <a6aa93b2-cb28-6d79-10ef-7b18bae11231@bytedance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2021/12/14 10:50, Gang Li wrote:
> Hi,
> How about my per-process numa balancning patch;)
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211206024530.11336-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com/ 
>
Thanks, I believe both patches are base on the same reason. I did a 
quick search after reading tejun's message. Seems numactl with 
interleave option helps on the case, you can have a test to see if it's 
what you want.

Thanks,
Honglei