Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CC8C433EF for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234065AbhLNMkI (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:40:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35426 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234048AbhLNMkI (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:40:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0368C061574; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id p27-20020a05600c1d9b00b0033bf8532855so13664677wms.3; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:40:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Dndo8j4UzehaTo5bKy7wwG1lr1AlLkx6PDj4DExr68s=; b=Guxxe2oLW4eK6A+3rBC1L92oE8/Iol7ayEgqB8m1Q5SWyIQVssQPEJOtn/Oe9PbsyZ b7faUrE12StIJmkTYm9FplnssDslhpvZihyf9fg4ZqiY057GiHbg5302BU6IQkp2sjd9 yQGjrnLOBEBLOIBLMC8zfy0zQJm4WwOLHxhg7tfkqV3oYd+cxtVw3gszI9XzlCRV5BDS TWZp2pazWHpQm9sigJyAfGKx4aH+NolYrrTJi3rpO0Y7b4CmK0/p2xxc8lFwIzSP0kiR jA12UoFxSxiADoBaiXjk0uTJtdYmTl5GTUFYaa9vZUgAfdu4O1gOv5m1JHuOg1GYn2T+ chzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Dndo8j4UzehaTo5bKy7wwG1lr1AlLkx6PDj4DExr68s=; b=iaqFol3w3/DVYQswN4Zv1co/EcLdw2UUhohYpMIFSFyDmejBiiJGjv/zRNi7h7t/em RvCSKUw49FdqRnrpELo+1E44KHOXWIzlcfnvalwraN9YyyHlvP1N5gX6oryMcV0rkt9q ZreZbwpEHktX81Z695LzlJ+VlV2cVlOTx+dldpxGvdaAfKj2jeLsqnC20cyyKMf8dboC FujGarZIP81ucolRZzplynOzz0GBKY5mZs29qG7rbR2GDhPaRAGET8CptqL2HhFZMKIY P/EGBNHpNq8FPKGccoT1BX5d0fJ8351kP8mcWSumvd1E19O+5anqFveom/0KFj3ZpWEl F6Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311NhH7j7TyyuM2tHHix1g7Ouwvm7DjTyr+yUHDAv9zKtuhnN8M QFrK5fHUxQf32GD2SUz04eI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVXu4rLY0L/obmsActU03b7ywxHGbuiIXd4S3PnUGsrkBXCuR6sjcY+MCE+IiQCyP0+vM/Ug== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:b42:: with SMTP id k2mr1125227wmr.6.1639485606303; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:40:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r83sm2037596wma.22.2021.12.14.04.40.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:40:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:40:03 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/74] 4.19.221-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211213092930.763200615@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211213092930.763200615@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:29:31AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.221 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:29:16 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/508 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip