Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A543C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236304AbhLNRGr (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:06:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41982 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231544AbhLNRGp (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:06:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81814C061574 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id v15-20020a9d604f000000b0056cdb373b82so21575949otj.7 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IemfCDmXWx/SPnnub7QAI6IhttPGClVQvWol1/Vo8hE=; b=RfVV6DnVFt1imQzcrX+WIWydNs7BF19SXFkIHEtUg1n/CkWAkas8Z4tcWA0qcqEAPn igA5N73E1RtEwHAS6CeM+ooIhpZdT0yw826Tf6CocThL1ho6KQHjWocZkVD7HClqKvNr cY6G4qwOvCEaLjAmOvtoU0M4H/VJuFm9HRAa0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IemfCDmXWx/SPnnub7QAI6IhttPGClVQvWol1/Vo8hE=; b=64b+x/c/NdJv+DGY7BGT2X/c1Jw6v6YXOuHEofsE5lbq7UAVuKe9GF1j82OJBxtnou 34suHqFLh/H1Q1+MyQWkiMruTD+n+hdX0rzMGJ2Io1svD0HlQhMaPsYt8OllzY6e9szY fVNFhap1ZAy23GsF1j0NcRaj2ehb2wdJtdby6x69BJXSoO0OqX1LwTFfRaAxCkZZKWpc cLTWg0zIoMSY32KZo2WNc4Q0rqf4DGrfJVJJDJDxNxyHv3TupwVgkEczB7wqh4Mb2/aN oYgmt4MdJkCQRsw2NeIc6qUue9sR2fid8ALG4eKcLP2C6nMkmlDc/DldxhcijB/aYrQW GQHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316NXGWTBYTR26cUXNHvGxa38fXRHBfkiXQF1UgGFOyi2m6fKpw 31i5YwfDStE2EfsV7ud2bPw9jOrLobCkVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPXw827om0Y5Cd811nXaXL7/9e41CMccQTS2B8fiI1FTev8YKMtcA3PITQyHJiKz1ClqAf8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d7c:: with SMTP id l28mr5241205oti.372.1639501604855; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [24.9.64.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bl33sm76949oib.47.2021.12.14.09.06.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:06:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the kselftest tree To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan References: <20211213222443.474487-1-broonie@kernel.org> <1dcd2d43-cf39-3b4c-49b5-138d94f34433@linuxfoundation.org> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <2ee0bba7-879f-40e2-dd7d-d9b264d4d493@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:06:43 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/21 9:54 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:39:25AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 12/13/21 3:24 PM, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in: >>> >>> tools/include/linux/kernel.h >>> >>> between commits: >>> >>> d6e6a27d960f9 ("tools: Fix math.h breakage") >>> 066b34aa5461f ("tools: fix ARRAY_SIZE defines in tools and selftests hdrs") >>> >>> from the kselftest and origin trees and commit: >>> >>> f2aa11fd51440 ("tools: Fix math.h breakage") >>> >>> from the xarray tree. > > I've dropped that commit from the XArray tree since d6e6a27d960f9 > was essentially f2aa11fd51440 applied to Linus' tree. The only change > left in the XArray tree today is a documentation update. > >> Thank you. I will keep track of this when I send pull request. > > As long as what you have merges cleanly against Linus' tree (and I see > the "conflict" -- __round_mask() is defined adjacent to ARRAY_SIZE()), > then it'll be fine. You might want to rebase to a more recent Linus > tree to get rid of the conflict. > When I applied on rc4 base, I didn't see any problems. This is a minor one - I can mention this when I send my pull request. Shouldn't be a problem. thanks, -- Shuah