Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F88C433EF for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236826AbhLNSAo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:00:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54868 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233980AbhLNSAn (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:00:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F0FC061574 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id a83-20020a1c9856000000b00344731e044bso1412588wme.1 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:00:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+IqBfvBvBmcxlYVp+0RytaxVZtHRcBsFFTjJF1k6GHc=; b=syl17ArW/Ro29Zbp9gxKSi9F6jrmZBzC7sLm3nzXi7EDGIQAhTsYLLNgRXk//55C88 FXwHZ4tjhLDscHK5n5Dc+L4fYzfAOUzN7KLxxGPCDCjo/OKaYq2czOXm+aWWSaQPikgD /By7bPwufuY0ptkpd2PNguMeBSwB+FFn+a3R8Q052GW/FrMn+vWAxAhXePCGp+AVHmol AqR1Qbscl47KT1NtO+1CpZYcaswAb8GIrg2HyXea0ttGSEeejRWKX/Js1p5f/YMOQOuy atrdpDXS/SwpEffOTYA/SMzSkIZwFj9/Sz7xu5tJZu8D9GPTVOgeemIpI/ZPrNSn1MHA CvVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+IqBfvBvBmcxlYVp+0RytaxVZtHRcBsFFTjJF1k6GHc=; b=B7An01v6nHcrKlxxBRoZodgL/hkllLgRlWYW07R2Xh0tQeRQedGWG+S/cInz2gsPEI KmW0F1kSOGckw5nF0CaXZFzB0pUgU6DEJ801iGPbGrxkw+FvWZHIhM/5tTcRHvnWbQ1t xQAo/4uieDEHw0aE7LqA2OoUChiPXDyZ8rdAvE7fa53J6BlR3z/dnFAu92XOpoAFsbhg TEFE1d+d0IAMHN2RWG+DAFAaUZ/RogV74ZSth1gX6RLj4S5Z1qRrZ4mDhbWNFW9pdRAc AH4dtmdXJ+9i5UZgWcexA+eSbvaMZNTy3rvvFvww65YRxJktAY40ElgPkMfUZlxzRvG/ L1Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vH9Q5E0EyKsE41fGSzOylm+n7wzIe4qcHJ2o9yBZbeNNw8xUi ULzwej/kLdvMWzC7s/OsuBTtug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8XGNeI01OLB/kBYng+fTDxbTRqMS8BklKCp38WxzksFwtBiBht2PK8HWQTUdS3kbX1RMVJg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f217:: with SMTP id s23mr694802wmc.70.1639504841398; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:00:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from elver.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:13:b1a9:56e:da78:fa44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n36sm1316753wmr.2.2021.12.14.10.00.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:00:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:00:35 +0100 From: Marco Elver To: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev Cc: Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vincenzo Frascino , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Collingbourne , Evgenii Stepanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov Subject: Re: [PATCH mm v3 28/38] kasan, page_alloc: allow skipping memory init for HW_TAGS Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:54PM +0100, andrey.konovalov@linux.dev wrote: > From: Andrey Konovalov > > Add a new GFP flag __GFP_SKIP_ZERO that allows to skip memory > initialization. The flag is only effective with HW_TAGS KASAN. [...] > - * is being zeroed (either via __GFP_ZERO or via init_on_alloc). > + * is being zeroed (either via __GFP_ZERO or via init_on_alloc, provided that > + * __GFP_SKIP_ZERO is not set). > + * > + * %__GFP_SKIP_ZERO makes page_alloc skip zeroing memory. > + * Only effective when HW_TAGS KASAN is enabled. > * > * %__GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON makes KASAN skip unpoisoning on page allocation. > * Only effective in HW_TAGS mode. > @@ -242,6 +247,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct; > #define __GFP_COMP ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_COMP) > #define __GFP_ZERO ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_ZERO) > #define __GFP_ZEROTAGS ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_ZEROTAGS) > +#define __GFP_SKIP_ZERO ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_SKIP_ZERO) > #define __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON) > #define __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON) > > @@ -249,7 +255,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct; > #define __GFP_NOLOCKDEP ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NOLOCKDEP) > > /* Room for N __GFP_FOO bits */ > -#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT (26 + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) > +#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT (27 + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) You're adding several new flags, I think you should also make a corresponding change to include/trace/events/mmflags.h? At least __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON is currently in there.