Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FC2C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 21:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237856AbhLNV74 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:59:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232637AbhLNV7y (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:59:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63B8C06173E for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:59:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id n15-20020a17090a394f00b001b0f6d6468eso2015420pjf.3 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:59:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JAkKZ0pCEv3Q9dRQXCjR7WNBgstwuomwVPeTmZilwdM=; b=epmDaQAc1Tnwv/IqFpqD04GLSyKU6BZbRqsIkeNJZcqg8WxloFt6JKmVeqBKdC0pag E22DDY/KsAzsEmsWSPx5BZMBORoXV4VkcxBapDIX4cNgg4WuRmZVF0KNopwFudymk6la IvUAMnvcgh+bSTs/bG/Mw8VdleyLabbH26g/whmruU4cWRPWYd2g10LH63B11fbZKdZV cGzQoL99bDBFnmTN8w3fchmmzGHIp6sWH5TuoM1OHHamPubuPFgPbAAMwM/Iy5J0qUVl p7jJpWi76iLCA8nsQEoE+f9zhf7oiYSu98mZka6NMjHBoP/3QVxds490wNJQGMHsrSHE 5baQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JAkKZ0pCEv3Q9dRQXCjR7WNBgstwuomwVPeTmZilwdM=; b=eNUWd5f0s49u9aGGoJ2I57h50ABN3Of5P2srtl+E1tHruLqiNV9xNeW9hIAxpnmCp3 8kjDpXWTiBp8AUlzADGiWq0ZZFU5j8yuFRUoW7o3G6PZlv2eo/idxGtuJkrW+BPts94i dfcdw1vd0/k2wBtZYXYKAr+9v3CzVciE7iXbMoUlfq83ERK8cN4LELkU8aZXVruHSzQJ LPzmlpAEUFLRQWPq2Wo+EFiemOWPc5W+u8smgASDMcKBAtOUbUGSqQdhxPRWv5Y4afgd i+NJi++K+cJ8TB5M+v9CVy/sJGlNyRb6xGf4T8l2vL09uVUkP9CcuFKIIh/kEyg/w+fr LXYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qxTg2h4VRzhPqH1+LLQuYyO7wrGA655FGxlitcXCX0Ch2GBkF YrQ1nMwNQ441PKZUMqX2892YWIn6VrXYtvAtN5Hbnw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGUK0h6Wh7VqiiPsQQSvFrmSYbhLazhyAfbwYN1OyASyPfqefhfdfkam9JmIVbNzvh7towBLS3cbQ1rLNDV/g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1ce:b0:148:a2e8:2774 with SMTP id e14-20020a17090301ce00b00148a2e82774mr1443271plh.123.1639519193933; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:59:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211212033229.527955-1-davidgow@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20211212033229.527955-1-davidgow@google.com> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:59:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kunit: tool: Default --jobs to number of CPUs To: David Gow Cc: Daniel Latypov , Shuah Khan , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:32 PM David Gow wrote: > > The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs, > regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more > (or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the > number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many > superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems > sufficiently sensible to me. > > A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added: > get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a > hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so > should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future. > > Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins