Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2083C433FE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242195AbhLOLqG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:46:06 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:36590 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242168AbhLOLqD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:46:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D555540265 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:45:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1639568755; bh=5tMBnwEs/vWNX4NTSLds+QqZD5aWu/S+gNf17CfK8JM=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=vfe3+zipvDe/4vjs8VqT9Cx6fBLLo0bppnFoWIogi8n98jlcsiY2uV8ekW3LkIkoj moPxNRUsVv3SZAZwTGzrFNaJGIgZB9ROderuV/iFK3c1J3A/yGBv1wWA79IYD1JV2V MGfUQFP9LZymBcMQfj3epM9IkcqNXdLQpls7ZcMTfNDIzINMHrFHOZ4q3nemfNrQmV ForqNcXBIz9a60PZB+mCdbzdQCoEyo/w6MwLDcz4VTMQdk/8HQepI1i5lwU/kYZXDw WwNe45W067pAA8hW1oH6FtsOpa4pHWvcJXTxVjZKwN4sAxgwseM1OrV70tQNhury9P VYI9X4ztFMXoA== Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id z33-20020a9d24a4000000b00579320f89ecso9668308ota.12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:45:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5tMBnwEs/vWNX4NTSLds+QqZD5aWu/S+gNf17CfK8JM=; b=SBBpnPp5IL5aqjNTBYiZS3L+Kfp1O4UndRASgRrk1dqKJSOVcEEokI5NBUzti6ZcbT /rUV/R5cJnifF6g63wkZ07DbivOW+AXvYChAwP8SB5/XcM1EyVq44E7QVtHDrjeC39k0 N42gD6DCvT/vNZ42UJd/pKWB+6oUYPEfh1VXAA9P04/pgN0polHJv9ynvmOG7KroUINb GkUKXGPbbq+aabAgHYSX04E5vv/0Th0kuSHFaz0VMGFjPOMbANjxcygP5WB7CCi7xJJY A4cLUBUhKj//H/9bCFEpz0AsEWH9Oj0sOtrfVAzxrA3nJn8L6pSd1jN6u2YMeuvWMlGK JlHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QwGe67lnPQG5/YFZPpSMFV8cIlmNbb0aX27sl+ico0BgL8t/a s4Fe7XmevPparGqH5vbsghntcZXiTnEgtGk37XQ/5Ejdqbp5oOqjWJQtVvgVLsBfb1acDyKj9y0 jU0D47VCN7W13wPl2p9h+iB3sfpYV3r/93OSi3yuzmK46xTEUMpzlucIM+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d87:: with SMTP id y7mr8276894oti.269.1639568753843; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:45:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUZs3tekHx4L7AzmeZS7ZHKZrzmVXmBqWxSo92TBMGIxeMG8WyBZlVeLYPA06s3SesslmBxwaGtWlDT9HtkMs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d87:: with SMTP id y7mr8276881oti.269.1639568753625; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:45:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211215065508.313330-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <1bf16614c29e47d8a57cfd6ee4ee50ae@realtek.com> In-Reply-To: From: Kai-Heng Feng Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:45:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtw88: Disable PCIe ASPM while doing NAPI poll on 8821CE To: Jian-Hong Pan Cc: Pkshih , Yan-Hsuan Chuang , Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Bernie Huang , Brian Norris , linux-wireless , Linux Netdev List , Linux Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:07 PM Jian-Hong Pan wrote: > > Pkshih =E6=96=BC 2021=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5= =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=89 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=884:03=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jian-Hong Pan > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 3:16 PM > > > > > > Tried to apply this patch for testing. But it seems conflicting to > > > commit c81edb8dddaa "rtw88: add quirk to disable pci caps on HP 250 G= 7 > > > Notebook PC" in wireless-drivers-next repo. > > > > > > > I fix the conflict manually, and the ASPM setting is expected. > > Yes! Same from my side. Sorry for that, I used the wrong tree. Will send a new one. Kai-Heng > > Jian-Hong Pan