Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6135CC433FE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234514AbhLOUId (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:08:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:36566 "EHLO mail-ot1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234378AbhLOUIb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:08:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id w6-20020a9d77c6000000b0055e804fa524so26309508otl.3; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:08:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8fYA1Lh38/WtqP2VbO7QAawqRgbA2M/ZaUNoa7bm4S8=; b=JSOgeWTbZNwxf35H6yC+ukb9zs/tmEsETdacLdgXz9w23f4H8OWSBcxIcyDIQozlsH GIwuA3KgxlpPQl+HSMtEhwvMPwNdDArtSv9Q1sOVo52ZpIpkqV56a4Dt9/ozS/k1Uqv4 T61FekXKaYiAhp+L+LhWIYu6dH71cZ4CxGNmmQ9OR/jw/rXCLrSE8ft8wd3s3ZmReYpa yjY2jcZBkaD+FNb9dYXG+eilQJbLeNVHpFgeJKO1WS+m9A2EimEXl8gCNrPiTSLcKS/D 450rlqqTLrGCNwTG227K1tLaVZF/a8uKKlk+iZ+Gqr/hUyipJalbRYYsNA/bcXlPUQJJ yyow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eBf5F/40UnFpQbTEi9lptPsGOl+G8lVH84iCU6kezAI81/sGT faMF+yZGOnakLZLaDiwEEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu2+JZYL10Nng91GC/KkeqIeZYh6QkukuE9k+tvIFOEQ0EQb15j4uGRfHz78Zbk1XpAG0+JQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2681:: with SMTP id l1mr10022636otu.378.1639598911231; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm618790oof.19.2021.12.15.12.08.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 1751820 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:08:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:08:29 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: frowand.list@gmail.com Cc: Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: unittest: 64 bit dma address test requires arch support Message-ID: References: <20211212221852.233295-1-frowand.list@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211212221852.233295-1-frowand.list@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 16:18:52 -0600, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote: > From: Frank Rowand > > If an architecture does not support 64 bit dma addresses then testing > for an expected dma address >= 0x100000000 will fail. > > Fixes: e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset") > Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand > --- > drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks!