Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CCDC4332F for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234905AbhLOULF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:11:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:44710 "EHLO mail-ot1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231579AbhLOULE (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:11:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id u18-20020a9d7212000000b00560cb1dc10bso26256420otj.11; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:11:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9qVaJO/5MfbAvvlhFGg3nSevyFof/ioLFiAZ2wARtMM=; b=eiJ3OPuSJ20dz667cIKWP85p/GHQka2OJvgr9ayGrz5W/2741iX5WDMsiMcjJXI2A7 E8ILNIW+z5gshWeoIAeUwI88hxkaKS0RrQjJO4n61GvUVjG179cAASIOA0r1AZyCLnp6 8f7e20+lRDvMVOJxg8xsisIb9hdi7IFd5o83t2vecM38Auz0WxssZob/rt6FDBIuqIkQ 0uuf29SwfVs2CCnpbyhtGAzZK960q5KUrOfUIq0LGaCs1d/G5A4VcX/bQ5VCBWeXYLcU kAYCrjC9wxoKeyShttE5D1toDHrbECvaee9i2XHdeb7+nRzd4DOOxjiXPZZHf86qPdKh q7hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vRc0Wm3ZcAmXS5Yr7H0aZcAOiyJ9sfelbY0bO/d6CaFrfIxGc 4SfxytTb2i6s/FZPVR+SWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPfRyuf46sG0u6LDBT3FRO/L5ko6NHR9tQs/c0RANwuC3H3ipxtM6tlzmlneqHIUQpfli81A== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6653:: with SMTP id q19mr10401271otm.116.1639599064166; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-148-213.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.148.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6sm575430ois.3.2021.12.15.12.11.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 1755863 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:11:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:11:02 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Luca Weiss Cc: Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rishabh Bhatnagar , Bjorn Andersson , phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Manivannan Sadhasivam , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Sai Prakash Ranjan Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Don't mark LLCC interrupt as required Message-ID: References: <20211213082614.22651-1-luca.weiss@fairphone.com> <20211213082614.22651-9-luca.weiss@fairphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211213082614.22651-9-luca.weiss@fairphone.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:26:09 +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > Newer SoCs like SM6350 or SM8250 don't provide an interrupt for LLCC. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss > Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring