Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965713AbXAYJQI (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:16:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965722AbXAYJQH (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:16:07 -0500 Received: from web52903.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.13]:39727 "HELO web52903.mail.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965713AbXAYJQG (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:16:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=08vfs4zSc9TsPk1+8ggyfEg5JbaMsJN5V71N1GTaX2sbyDI/IRl76/VX94kfzFOSvfND4kqEuLU+XKi9f+jaQZZo95ju4WmhxXlHPQYZRJQHdYWVOWOsVCA7cBNCLztPStieom59WQkoJ/CkpqrwD24q9Edxz49UohUb70xVGzg=; X-YMail-OSG: 2zhql0IVM1lyExyPdUnrKhXE3s13lvLXIKl7JKFmB0d7ZbSNcoClJH3NMYo4QSHgL3nRFap_h1VkdFwoANXN5_FEdNbHS9igF23Cj23ko6lR9goge0xWXtQhSrMGCq8JeNJX8HJm5cQsRuE- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:16:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Rankin Subject: Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans? To: Ken Moffat Cc: Alan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070125010020.GB26654@deepthought> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <486377.64357.qm@web52903.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1636 Lines: 35 --- Ken Moffat wrote: > At the moment, you have a problem that nobody recognises. If you're not > willing to test if the problem happens repeatably, (you appear to > have had one failure and immediately reverted to an old kernel), who > do you think will be able to fix it? This bug seems to be in the kernel's "memory management", and the last memory-related bug I had (caused by a bad DIMM on another machine) caused creeping filesystem corruption. However, this machine is my main desktop, and so I am keen to keep the filesystems intact. So yes, that involves not running a kernel that has shown itself to be unreliable. I was hoping that someone with a deeper knowledge of the differences between 2.6.18 and 2.6.19 would have an idea of what might have triggered this problem, and yes, I was also thinking that some more people would trip over it and help debug it. But anyway - can someone please tell me what "Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)" is *really* saying/implying? Because I am currently translating this as "I WANT TO EAT YOUR FILESYSTEMS". Cheers, Chris ___________________________________________________________ New Yahoo! Mail is the ultimate force in competitive emailing. Find out more at the Yahoo! Mail Championships. Plus: play games and win prizes. http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/